Email · kontakt@ine.org.pl
Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe
  • About
  • Publications
      • Publications

        The primary categories of materials published by the Institute as part of its research and analytical activities.

      • SEE ALL PUBLICATIONS

      • Analyses
        Daily commentary and analysis on international issues provided by our experts and analysts
      • Reports
        Comprehensive thematic studies on international relations and socio-political issues
      • Video
        Recordings of expert debates and series of video podcasts created by our team and experts
      • Maps
        Selection of maps depicting international alliances and foreign visits of key politicians
  • Programmes
      • Programmes

        The main areas of research and publication activities at the Institute with separate teams of experts, functioning under the supervision of the head of a particular programme.

      • WEBSITE OF THE THREE SEAS PROJECT

      • Europe
        Analyses and commentaries on European integration and the place of Europe on the political and economic map of the world
      • Security
        Studies in the field of international and internal security of individual states, with particular emphasis on the role of NATO
      • Indo-Pacific
        An overview of the political and economic situation in the region, the status of the U.S.-China rivalry, and the EU’s policy towards China
      • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
        Analyses and studies of the Three Seas Initiative, taking into account the perspectives of the participating states
  • People
  • Contact-Careers
  • Polish-Czech Forum
  • Polski
Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe
  • About
  • Publications
      • Publications

        The primary categories of materials published by the Institute as part of its research and analytical activities.

      • SEE ALL PUBLICATIONS

      • Analyses
        Daily commentary and analysis on international issues provided by our experts and analysts
      • Reports
        Comprehensive thematic studies on international relations and socio-political issues
      • Video
        Recordings of expert debates and series of video podcasts created by our team and experts
      • Maps
        Selection of maps depicting international alliances and foreign visits of key politicians
  • Programmes
      • Programmes

        The main areas of research and publication activities at the Institute with separate teams of experts, functioning under the supervision of the head of a particular programme.

      • WEBSITE OF THE THREE SEAS PROJECT

      • Europe
        Analyses and commentaries on European integration and the place of Europe on the political and economic map of the world
      • Security
        Studies in the field of international and internal security of individual states, with particular emphasis on the role of NATO
      • Indo-Pacific
        An overview of the political and economic situation in the region, the status of the U.S.-China rivalry, and the EU’s policy towards China
      • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
        Analyses and studies of the Three Seas Initiative, taking into account the perspectives of the participating states
  • People
  • Contact-Careers
  • Polish-Czech Forum
  • Polski
Sep 01
China, Indo-Pacific, Map, Publications, USA

American vs. Chinese Systems of Alliances and Accords in the Asia-Pacific Region [Maps]

September 1, 2022

The authors: Kamil Opara, Jakub Iwan, Łukasz Kobierski

The aim of the maps is to illustrate the network of cooperation platforms as well as economic and military dependencies installed in the Asia-Pacific Region by the US and China across the last few decades (until 31st July 2022).

The Asia-Pacific region (further denoted as AP Region) broadly speaking encompasses the countries located in the f area of the Pacific Ocean (East Asia, Russian Far East, Australia, and Oceania). The strategic importance of the region stems from several factors. It is traversed by crucial international trade routes (both maritime and ground); it is also abundant with energy resources located in different parts of the Ocean (primarily in the South China Sea). Moreover, it is also characterized by the abundance rich resources of living resources and significant maritime biodiversity. Last but not least, it comprises the countries of huge significance on the international stage (vide e.g. China, India, Australia, etc.).

In the AP Region (part of the Indo-Pacific region), the two world biggest superpowers (the United States and the Chinese People’s Republic) locate their vested interests. The rivalry between these two superpowers has grown more significant in the last few years, manifesting itself also in this region. Washington and Beijing embrace a variety of tools to enlarge and solidify their spheres of influence in the area, e.g. by striking multiple economic (trade facilitations, economic cooperation) and military (security, defensive commitments, shared drills) deals.

Below, we present two maps that display some of the AP countries associated with the US and China via different economic and military deals. Every accord is specified and shortly described. The map does not include the Russian Federation. It encompasses though some of the deals whose provisions (or, in some cases, even the fact of its conclusion) are not made public due to their potential importance (e.g. CPR-Samoa, CPR-Solomon Islands, US-Solomon Islands). The analysis also features some remarks regarding the QUAD as an informal alliance. Despite the lack of an official agreement between the countries, QUAD is developing so considerably, that the authors recognized the need to consider also this group of countries.

The map no.1 The U.S. and Asian&Pacific region agreements

The map no. 2 China and Asian&Pacific region agreements

The maps aim to illustrate the network of cooperation platforms as well as economic and military dependencies built in the Asia-Pacific Region by Washington and Beijing over the last few decades (until 31st July 2022). The maps do not contain all of the agreements, only the most relevant to the issue of the analysis according to the authors of the following report (the full list can be found below the “Conclusions” section).

Conclusions:

  • The American system of alliances and associations in the AP Region is more advanced than the Chinese one. The number of military (security and defence) and economic deals struck by Washington is bigger than in the case of Beijing. It signifies that military cooperation with the US is seen as an attractive option by many countries in the region.
  • Many AP countries develop collaboration both with the US and China (e.g. South Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, and Australia). It often results from the economic calculations and will to reap the financial benefits thanks to the deals struck with both sides. Whereby, indicated countries tend to reach both military and economic agreements only with one side, the other country is left only with the economic agreement (vide Japan). It is probably a result of the high sensitivity and strategic importance of the military sphere and related protection of data and information.
  • United States is more determined to establish military bonds with the AP countries (to put up a kind of protective umbrella upon the allies) – this conclusion bases on the observation that Washington is entering more agreements that pertain to military issues than the economy. At the same time, China is focused primarily on building and strengthening economic ties with the AP countries. That state of affairs might also be rendered by some non-strategic, objective factors, such as the geographical vicinity of CPR. It certainly implies the necessity of upholding and strengthening the economic cooperation with China (it also results from strong economic connections between AP and China). 
  • Some states orient themselves unequivocally on cooperation with only one country (either the US or CPR). It is usually an implication of political calculations and the following foreign policy which is often related to common values and regulations. India can serve as an example – as a democratic country, they hold military agreements only with the United States. In the economic field, they are also more inclined to cooperate with the States – that is partly conditioned by the regional rivalry between India and China. Sri Lanka, which makes up an interesting example, to a large extent replicates the main directions of India’s foreign policy.
  • Over the recent few years, China has managed to establish a strong network of dependencies – particularly economic – with the ASEAN countries. All states grouped in the ASEAN are sides of either bilateral, or multilateral deals with CPR. Furthermore, ASEAN as an organization has signed a separate agreement with Beijing.
  • The United States institutionalize (through entering a number of deals) the cooperation both with the democratic and Western-thinking countries (vide Australia, New Zealand, to some extent also India) and with the countries of typically Asian specificity, with completely different legal cultures and political systems. 
  • Establishing and cherishing the collaboration in the economic (trade in particular) and military (military-defensive) fields makes up a tool of the regional rivalry between the CPR and the US.
  • The systems of bilateral and multilateral deals that the US and China hold with the AP countries provide only a partial explanation of the intricacies of interstate relations in the region. They serve as a useful tool to conceptualize the extent of respective spheres of military and economic influence, constructed by both superpowers in the region. Identifying the actual regional networks of collaboration and military/economic dependencies deserves further observation, intensified analytical effort, and deepened consideration of the qualitative criteria.

Military agreements (security, trainings, maneuvers, defence commitments) between the US and AP countries:

  • Japan – Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan from 1960. It is a bilateral agreement that establishes a military alliance between the two countries, American defence commitments to Japan, and keeping American military bases on Japanese territory.
  • Thailand – Thanat–Rusk Communiqué from 1962. It is a bilateral agreement encompassing the military alliance of both countries and American defence commitments to Thailand.
  • Philippines – Mutual Defense Treaty between the Republic of the Philippines and the United States of America from 1951. It is a bilateral agreement establishing a  military alliance of both countries and indicating a commitment of both parties to collective action when one of them has been attacked by another country.
  • South Korea – Mutual Defense Treaty between the United States and the Republic of Korea from 1953. This bilateral deal has been a bedrock for a long-lasting military alliance between both countries – Americans are obligated to protect Korea, and their army is permitted to remain on the Korean territory.
  • New Zealand and Australia – ANZUS (Australia, New Zealand, United States Security Treaty) from 1951. It is a multilateral treaty establishing a military alliance of the three countries and collective support in case of external assault on the US, New Zealand, or Australia.
  • Australia – AUKUS (Australia, United Kingdom, United States) from 2021. It is a multilateral treaty that assumes American-British cooperation in building nuclear-powered submarines for the Australian Navy and joint efforts in military industry, i.a. focused on advanced military technologies.
  • India – bilateral Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement from 2018 encompassing the exchange of information about the military maneuvers and hardware used in them. Besides, it also establishes cooperation in the 2+2 format (Indian and American foreign affairs and defence ministries).
  • India – Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement from 2016. It is a bilateral treaty that allows each side to use the other side’s bases to fuel and service the military hardware.
  • Brunei – bilateral Memorandum of Understanding from 1994 encompassing joint military drills and organizing shared training programs.
  • Bangladesh, Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand – Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training. It is a multilateral deal extended successively by other members since 1995. It serves as a framework for organizing joint military drills of the US Navy and respective navies of member-states.  
  • Singapore – Memorandum of Understanding Regarding United States Use of Facilities in Singapore from 1990, extended in 2019. On the basis of this bilateral agreement, American jet fighters and military vessels are allowed to station on the Singaporean territory until 2035.
  • Singapore – bilateral U.S.–Singapore Strategic Framework Agreement from 2005 allowing the American military vessels to station in the Singaporean Navy base in Changi.
  • Philippines – bilateral Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement from 2014 aimed at organizing the military cooperation between the parties and validating American Army deployed in the Philippines.
  • Solomon Islands – according to the information available from the US Department of State, the US cooperates with the Solomon Islands (mainly with the police forces) in the fields of military drills, training, border protection, etc. The specific text of the agreement has not been unveiled. 
  • Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mongolia, Nepal, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Thailand, East Timor, Tonga, Fiji, and Vietnam – multilateral agreement successively entered by the respective countries since 2000. It assumes conducting joint training organized by the US National Guard for local law enforcement units.
  • Australia, India, and Japan – non-structured (non-based on the official document) multilateral cooperation format QUAD (Quadrilateral Security Dialogue)[1] initiated in 2007 and reinvigorated in 2017. It assumes joint military drills, enhancing the defensive potentials of member-states, developing economic partnerships, and critical branches of industry, establishing new supply chains, cooperation in the field of cybersecurity, climate protection, and countering the effects of natural disasters. 

Economic agreements between the US and AP countries:

  • Australia – Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement from 2004. It is a bilateral deal aimed at the facilitation and development of economic cooperation.
  • South Korea – bilateral United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement from 2007, aimed at facilitation and development of economic cooperation.

Military agreements (security, trainings, maneuvers, defence commitments) between the CPR and AP countries:

  • Solomon Islands – bilateral China-Solomon Islands Security Pact from 2022 which content and provisions are partly undisclosed to the general public. According to the media reports, the deal might concern the presence of the Chinese law enforcement officers, troops, and Navy vessels in Honiara on Guadalcanal island. It is alleged also to allow the Chinese Navy to replenish the supplies and service the vessels on Solomon Island’s territory. 
  • Fiji – Memorandum of Understanding from 2011. Based on this agreement, CPR will assist Fijian authorities in providing training for police officers in the areas like rescue operations, countering terrorism, preventing money laundering, and countering human trafficking and cybercrime. 
  • Cambodia – Memorandum of Understanding from 2022. Based on that agreement, both sides will combine efforts to improve cooperation in terms of strategic communication, joint military maneuvers, and training, as well as the exchange of personnel. Moreover, Chinese police officers will be based in Cambodia and tasked with countering the crime in South-East Asia. Unofficially the agreement allows the Chinese navy to deploy their vessels to the Navy base in Ream (Cambodia).
  • Samoa – bilateral agreement from 2022 whose provisions are yet to be published. The leaks indicate that this agreement is in some areas similar to the one reached with the Solomon Islands and concerns i.a. providing training for the Samoan police officers by the CPR, cybersecurity cooperation, and broader access of the Chinses to the natural resources in Samoa. 

Economic agreements between the CPR and AP countries:

  • Australia, Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Laos, Malaysia, Burma, New Zealand, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam – multilateral agreement Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership from 2020 (implemented in 2022). It envisions the liquidation of more than 90% of customs tariffs during the next 20 years and significant facilitation in trade between signatory states. Besides, it announces elaborating the common legal framework for e-commerce and the protection of intellectual property.
  • Cambodia – bilateral China-Cambodia Free Trade Agreement from 2020 (facilitations in trade between the countries, i.a lifting tariffs).
  • Maldives – bilateral China-Maldives Free Trade Agreement from 2017 (as above).
  • Australia – bilateral China-Australia Free Trade Agreement from 2015 (as above).
  • South Korea – bilateral China-ROK Free Trade Agreement from 2014 (as above).
  • Singapore – bilateral China-Singapore Free Trade Agreement  from 2008 (as above).
  • New Zealand  – bilateral China-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement from 2008 (as above).
  • Pakistan – bilateral China-Pakistan Free Trade Agreement from 2009 (as above).
  • ASEAN countries (Vietnam, Malaysia, Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Burma, Singapore, Laos, Cambodia, Brunei) – multilateral agreement China-ASEAN Free Trade Area. It has been gradually implemented since 2002 and provides facilitations in economic cooperation and trade.

Translation: Marcin Pijaj


[1] Quad was initiated primarily as a military cooperation format. Over the recent few years, the tendency to extend the QUAD agenda to economic security issues has been spotted. In fact, QUAD should be considered as the format of both military and economic cooperation.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-Mail
Zespół INE

Related Posts

See All Publications
  • China, European Union, Indo-Pacific, Publications

EU-China Affairs Review January 2026

Mikołaj Woźniak, Karolina Czarnowska 1.01. China warns EU against restrictions on carbon emissions trading The Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM)…
  • Mikołaj Woźniak
  • February 16, 2026
  • Europe, Publications, Russia

Russia Affairs Review January 2026

Ksawery Stawiński, Kateryna Vasylyk 6.01 – Major Demographic Crisis in RussiaDuring the annual international conference “Foundry Council” in Chelyabinsk, renowned…
  • Ksawery Stawiński
  • February 16, 2026
  • Africa and Middle East, Analysis, Publications

Overview of Events in the Middle East – December 2025

Israel–Lebanon Relations: Status as of December 2025 Beirut, December 1–31 Since October 2024, a ceasefire has been in effect between…
  • Kasjusz Matyjasek
  • January 31, 2026
See All Publications

Comments are closed.

Zespół INE
Program Europa tworzą:

Marcin Chruściel

Dyrektor programu. Absolwent studiów doktoranckich z zakresu nauk o polityce na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim, magister stosunków międzynarodowych i europeistyki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prezes Zarządu Instytutu Nowej Europy.

dr Artur Bartoszewicz

Przewodniczący Rady Programowej Instytutu Nowej Europy. Doktor nauk ekonomicznych Szkoły Głównej Handlowej. Ekspert w dziedzinie polityki publicznej, w tym m. in. strategii państwa i gospodarki.

Michał Banasiak

Specjalizuje się w relacjach sportu i polityki. Autor analiz, komentarzy i wywiadów z zakresu dyplomacji sportowej i polityki międzynarodowej. Były dziennikarz Polsat News i wysłannik redakcji zagranicznej Telewizji Polskiej.

Maciej Pawłowski

Ekspert ds. migracji, gospodarki i polityki państw basenu Morza Śródziemnego. W latach 2018-2020 Analityk PISM ds. Południowej Europy. Autor publikacji w polskiej i zagranicznej prasie na temat Hiszpanii, Włoch, Grecji, Egiptu i państw Magrebu. Od września 2020 r. mieszka w północnej Afryce (Egipt, Algieria).

Jędrzej Błaszczak

Absolwent studiów prawniczych Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Katowicach. Jego zainteresowania badawcze koncentrują się na Inicjatywie Trójmorza i polityce w Bułgarii. Doświadczenie zdobywał w European Foundation of Human Rights w Wilnie, Center for the Study of Democracy w Sofii i polskich placówkach dyplomatycznych w Teheranie i Tbilisi.

Program Bezpieczeństwo tworzą:

dr Aleksander Olech

Dyrektor programu. Wykładowca na Baltic Defence College, absolwent Europejskiej Akademii Dyplomacji oraz Akademii Sztuki Wojennej. Jego główne zainteresowania badawcze to terroryzm, bezpieczeństwo w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej oraz rola NATO i UE w środowisku zagrożeń hybrydowych.

dr Agnieszka Rogozińska

Członek Rady Programowej Instytutu Nowej Europy. Doktor nauk społecznych w dyscyplinie nauki o polityce. Zainteresowania badawcze koncentruje na problematyce bezpieczeństwa euroatlantyckiego, instytucjonalnym wymiarze bezpieczeństwa i współczesnych zagrożeniach.

Aleksy Borówka

Doktorant na Wydziale Nauk Społecznych Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Przewodniczący Krajowej Reprezentacji Doktorantów w kadencji 2020. Autor kilkunastu prac naukowych, poświęconych naukom o bezpieczeństwie, naukom o polityce i administracji oraz stosunkom międzynarodowym. Laureat I, II oraz III Międzynarodowej Olimpiady Geopolitycznej.

Karolina Siekierka

Absolwentka Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego na kierunku stosunki międzynarodowe, specjalizacji Bezpieczeństwo i Studia Strategiczne. Jej zainteresowania badawcze obejmują politykę zagraniczną i wewnętrzną Francji, prawa człowieka oraz konflikty zbrojne.

Stanisław Waszczykowski

Podoficer rezerwy, student studiów magisterskich na kierunku Bezpieczeństwo Międzynarodowe i Dyplomacja na Akademii Sztuki Wojennej, były praktykant w BBN. Jego zainteresowania badawcze obejmują m.in. operacje pokojowe ONZ oraz bezpieczeństwo Ukrainy.

Leon Pińczak

Student studiów drugiego stopnia na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim na kierunku stosunki międzynarodowe. Dziennikarz polskojęzycznej redakcji Biełsatu. Zawodowo zajmuje się obszarem postsowieckim, rosyjską polityką wewnętrzną i doktrynami FR. Biegle włada językiem rosyjskim.

Program Indo-Pacyfik tworzą:

Łukasz Kobierski

Dyrektor programu. Współzałożyciel INE oraz prezes zarządu w latach 2019-2021. Stypendysta szkoleń z zakresu bezpieczeństwa na Daniel Morgan Graduate School of National Security w Waszyngtonie, ekspert od stosunków międzynarodowych. Absolwent Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego oraz Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. Wiceprezes Zarządu INE.

dr Joanna Siekiera

Prawnik międzynarodowy, doktor nauk społecznych, adiunkt na Wydziale Prawa Uniwersytetu w Bergen w Norwegii. Była stypendystką rządu Nowej Zelandii na Uniwersytecie Victorii w Wellington, niemieckiego Institute of Cultural Diplomacy, a także francuskiego Institut de relations internationales et stratégiques.

Paweł Paszak

Absolwent stosunków międzynarodowych (spec. Wschodnioazjatycka) na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim oraz stypendysta University of Kent (W. Brytania) i Hainan University (ChRL). Doktorant UW i Akademii Sztuki Wojennej. Jego zainteresowania badawcze obejmują politykę zagraniczną ChRL oraz strategiczną rywalizację Chiny-USA.

Jakub Graca

Magister stosunków międzynarodowych na Uniwersytecie Jagiellońskim; studiował także filologię orientalną (specjalność: arabistyka). Analityk Centrum Inicjatyw Międzynarodowych (Warszawa) oraz Instytutu Nowej Europy. Zainteresowania badawcze: Stany Zjednoczone (z naciskiem na politykę zagraniczną), relacje transatlantyckie.

Patryk Szczotka

Absolwent filologii dalekowschodniej ze specjalnością chińską na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim oraz student kierunku double degree China and International Relations na Aalborg University oraz University of International Relations (国际关系学院) w Pekinie. Jego zainteresowania naukowe to relacje polityczne i gospodarcze UE-ChRL oraz dyplomacja.

The programme's team:

Marcin Chruściel

Programme director. Graduate of PhD studies in Political Science at the University of Wroclaw and Master studies in International Relations at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. President of the Management Board at the Institute of New Europe.

PhD Artur Bartoszewicz

Chairman of the Institute's Programme Board. Doctor of Economic Sciences at the SGH Warsaw School of Economics. Expert in the field of public policy, including state and economic strategies. Expert at the National Centre for Research and Development and the Digital Poland Projects Centre.

Michał Banasiak

He specializes in relationship of sports and politics. Author of analysis, comments and interviews in the field of sports diplomacy and international politics. Former Polsat News and Polish Television’s foreign desk journalist.

Maciej Pawłowski

Expert on migration, economics and politics of Mediterranean countries. In the period of 2018-2020 PISM Analyst on Southern Europe. Author of various articles in Polish and foreign press about Spain, Italy, Greece, Egypt and Maghreb countries. Since September 2020 lives in North Africa (Egypt, Algeria).

Jędrzej Błaszczak

Graduate of Law at the University of Silesia. His research interests focus on the Three Seas Initiative and politics in Bulgaria. He acquired experience at the European Foundation of Human Rights in Vilnius, the Center for the Study of Democracy in Sofia, and in Polish embassies in Tehran and Tbilisi.

PhD Aleksander Olech

Programme director. Visiting lecturer at the Baltic Defence College, graduate of the European Academy of Diplomacy and War Studies University. His main research interests include terrorism, international cooperation for security in Eastern Europe and the role of NATO and the EU with regard to hybrid threats.

PhD Agnieszka Rogozińska

Member of the Institute's Programme Board. Doctor of Social Sciences in the discipline of Political Science. Editorial secretary of the academic journals "Politics & Security" and "Independence: journal devoted to Poland's recent history". Her research interests focus on security issues.

Aleksy Borówka

PhD candidate at the Faculty of Social Sciences in the University of Wroclaw, the President of the Polish National Associations of PhD Candidates in 2020. The author of dozen of scientific papers, concerning security studies, political science, administration, international relations. Laureate of the I, II and III International Geopolitical Olympiad.

Karolina Siekierka

Graduate of International Relations specializing in Security and Strategic Studies at University of Warsaw. Erasmus student at the Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1) and the Institut d’Etudes Politique de Paris (Sciences Po Paris). Her research areas include human rights, climate change and armed conflicts.

Stanisław Waszczykowski

Reserve non-commissioned officer. Master's degree student in International Security and Diplomacy at the War Studies University in Warsaw, former trainee at the National Security Bureau. His research interests include issues related to UN peacekeeping operations and the security of Ukraine.

Leon Pińczak

A second-degree student at the University of Warsaw, majoring in international relations. A journalist of the Polish language edition of Belsat. Interested in the post-Soviet area, with a particular focus on Russian internal politics and Russian doctrines - foreign, defense and information-cybernetic.

Łukasz Kobierski

Programme director. Deputy President of the Management Board. Scholarship holder at the Daniel Morgan Graduate School of National Security in Washington and an expert in the field of international relations. Graduate of the University of Warsaw and the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

PhD Joanna Siekiera

International lawyer, Doctor of social sciences, postdoctor at the Faculty of Law, University of Bergen, Norway. She was a scholarship holder of the New Zealand government at the Victoria University of Wellington, Institute of Cultural Diplomacy in Germany, Institut de relations internationales et stratégiques in France.

Paweł Paszak

Graduate of International Relations (specialisation in East Asian Studies) from the University of Warsaw and scholarship holder at the University of Kent (UK) and Hainan University (China). PhD candidate at the University of Warsaw and the War Studies University. His research areas include the foreign policy of China and the strategic rivalry between China and the US in the Indo-Pacific.

Jakub Graca

Master of International Relations at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. He also studied Arabic therein. An analyst at the Center for International Initiatives (Warsaw) and the Institute of New Europe. Research interests: United States (mainly foreign policy), transatlantic relations.

Patryk Szczotka

A graduate of Far Eastern Philology with a specialization in China Studies at the University of Wroclaw and a student of a double degree “China and International Relations” at Aalborg University and University of International Relations (国际关系学院) in Beijing. His research interests include EU-China political and economic relations, as well as diplomacy.

Three Seas Think Tanks Hub is a platform of cooperation among different think tanks based in 3SI member countries. Their common goal is to strengthen public debate and understanding of the Three Seas region seen from the political, economic and security perspective. The project aims at exchanging ideas, research and publications on the region’s potential and challenges.

Members

The Baltic Security Foundation (Latvia)

The BSF promotes the security and defense of the Baltic Sea region. It gathers security experts from the region and beyond, provides a platform for discussion and research, promotes solutions that lead to stronger regional security in the military and other areas.

The Institute for Politics and Society (Czech Republic)

The Institute analyses important economic, political, and social areas that affect today’s society. The mission of the Institute is to cultivate the Czech political and public sphere through professional and open discussion.

Nézöpont Institute (Hungary)

The Institute aims at improving Hungarian public life and public discourse by providing real data, facts and opinions based on those. Its primary focus points are Hungarian youth, media policy and Central European cooperation.

The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (Austria)

The wiiw is one of the principal centres for research on Central, East and Southeast Europe with 50 years of experience. Over the years, the Institute has broadened its expertise, increasing its regional coverage – to European integration, the countries of Wider Europe and selected issues of the global economy.

The International Institute for Peace (Austria)

The Institute strives to address the most topical issues of the day and promote dialogue, public engagement, and a common understanding to ensure a holistic approach to conflict resolution and a durable peace. The IIP functions as a platform to promote peace and non-violent conflict resolution across the world.

The Institute for Regional and International Studies (Bulgaria)

The IRIS initiates, develops and implements civic strategies for democratic politics at the national, regional and international level. The Institute promotes the values of democracy, civil society, freedom and respect for law and assists the process of deepening Bulgarian integration in NATO and the EU.

The European Institute of Romania

EIR is a public institution whose mission is to provide expertise in the field of European Affairs to the public administration, the business community, the social partners and the civil society. EIR’s activity is focused on four key domains: research, training, communication, translation of the EHRC case-law.

The Institute of New Europe (Poland)

The Institute is an advisory and analytical non-governmental organisation active in the fields of international politics, international security and economics. The Institute supports policy-makers by providing them with expert opinions, as well as creating a platform for academics, publicists, and commentators to exchange ideas.

YouTube

Latest publications

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • EU-China Affairs Review January 2026
    by Mikołaj Woźniak
    February 16, 2026
  • Russia Affairs Review January 2026
    by Ksawery Stawiński
    February 16, 2026
  • Overview of Events in the Middle East – December 2025
    by Kasjusz Matyjasek
    January 31, 2026

Categories

THE MOST POPULAR TAGS:

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

China European Union International politics International security Map Middle East Poland Russia Security Ukraine USA

  • About
  • Publications
  • Europe
  • Security
  • O nas
  • Publikacje
  • Europa
  • Bezpieczeństwo
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
  • People
  • Contact – Careers
  • Indo-Pacyfik
  • Trójmorze
  • Ludzie
  • Kontakt – Kariera

Financed with funds from the National Freedom Institute - Center for Civil Society Development under the Governmental Civil Society Organisations Development Programme for 2018-2030.

Sfinansowano ze środków Narodowego Instytutu Wolności – Centrum Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Obywatelskiego w ramach Rządowego Programu Rozwoju Organizacji Obywatelskich na lata 2018-2030.



© 2019-2024 The Institute of New Europe Foundation · All rights reserved · Support us