Email · kontakt@ine.org.pl
Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe
  • About
  • Publications
    • Analyses
    • Video
    • SEE ALL PUBLICATIONS
    • Reports
    • Maps
    • SEE ALL PUBLICATIONS
  • Programmes
    • Europe
    • Security
    • WEBSITE OF THE THREE SEAS PROJECT
    • Indo-Pacific
    • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
    • WEBSITE OF THE THREE SEAS PROJECT
  • People
  • Contact-Careers
  • 3 SEAS
  • EnglishEnglish
    • PolskiPolski
Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe
  • About
  • Publications
    • Analyses
    • Video
    • SEE ALL PUBLICATIONS
    • Reports
    • Maps
    • SEE ALL PUBLICATIONS
  • Programmes
    • Europe
    • Security
    • WEBSITE OF THE THREE SEAS PROJECT
    • Indo-Pacific
    • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
    • WEBSITE OF THE THREE SEAS PROJECT
  • People
  • Contact-Careers
  • 3 SEAS
  • EnglishEnglish
    • PolskiPolski
Nov 29
3SI, Analysis, China, European Union, Publications

China’s Influence in the Western Balkans: Partnership or confrontation?

November 29, 2021

The above analysis was first published on the International Institute for Peace website.

After the events in 2014 in Ukraine, namely the illegal annexation of the Crimean Peninsula and the military interference in Eastern Ukraine by the Russian Federation, many experts started to talk about the eruption of a new Cold War. However, this has been challenged again by many, who stated that the circumstances are now different and that we do not see a competition of capitalist versus communist ideology. However, another very influential actor into the geopolitical sphere gained attention. China. So, the tenor shifted towards the notion that there is something like a new Cold War, but it is not about the West versus Russia, but about the West versus China.

After it introduced its One Belt One Road initiative in 2013, economic investments have been the main tool for China in its foreign policy. Whereas China has been active in many African states for a long time already, as well as in EU countries, the engagement of China in the Western Balkan countries only recently attracted the attention of many observers.

So let us have a look at the context. In 2003, the European Union stated in its declaration of the EU-Western Balkans summit: “The EU reiterates its unequivocal support to the European perspective of the Western Balkan countries.” This has been a very important sign for the WB 6 (those not yet a member of the EU: Serbia, Montenegro, Albania, Kosovo, North-Macedonia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina) towards EU integration. With a possible EU accession, the hope of democratic and economic development, rule of law, human rights and better living-conditions arose within the societies in the region and Croatia in 2013 became a member of the EU. However, for the other WB6, the process of integration advances very slowly and there is still a huge gap in the socio-economic development between the WB and EU countries. With internal problems inside the EU – Brexit, democratic backsliding in some member countries, now the Covid-19 pandemic, migration influx, and instabilities in its neighborhood – a lack of interest of the EU in the region became obvious for the governments and the people. This disappointment with the slow process of integration, even though there have been incentives to step up regional cooperation e.g., the Berlin Process [1]which was launched in 2014, opens the door for traditional (Russia, Turkey) and non-traditional third actors (China and the United Arab Emirates).

Contrary to Russia and Turkey, who have historical and religious ties towards the region as well as geopolitical ambitions, China’s involvement in the Western Balkans is different. Investments in infrastructure, the energy sector and in communications follow their approach in foreign policy which culminates in the 1B1R initiative. The main aim is to create corridors to improve Sino-EU trade and to position itself as an indispensable international actor in the international arena. Therefore, the main value of the Western Balkan countries for Beijing lies in their proximity to the EU which is a major export market for China and not so much in the region`s countries themselves. China has been investing in many big infrastructure projects in the region, but for all the WB countries, the EU still is the leading trade partner accounting for almost 70% of the region’s total trade, whereas China accounts for less than 10% (between 6-10% imports and only 2-4% exports). Considering the lack of capital in the region and the ambitions to develop their infrastructure projects, Chinese investments are not per se a bad choice, so why should the EU bother about China’s presence? 

What is China’s Strategy in the Western Balkans?

China already set up the 17+1 initiative where it tries to promote business and investment relations between China and 16 countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Although five of the six Western Balkan countries (Kosovo is excluded, as China has never recognized it and does not have official diplomatic relations with Pristina) are part of this initiative, China prefers a government-to-government approach dealing with each country on an individual level. Even though it cannot be stated often enough that the EU is by far the biggest investor in the region, China did step up its state-led economic engagement in various fields. Since the EU did refrain from several infrastructure projects in the region which are considered important for some countries, the possibility of Chinese investments gained widespread attraction. Contrary to the EU, which has a multilateral approach and introduces conditionalities in sectors like transparency, public procurement, fiscal rentability, rule of law, anti-corruption and environmental protection, China with its no-conditionality approach seems to be an attractive alternative. A concrete example is the Chinese loan to Montenegro to build Bar-Boljare Highway which is perceived as a chance to profit from the one Belt one Road initiative by the Montenegrin government. Considering the small size of the country, the huge amount of the EUR 670 million loan makes Montenegro owing 22% of its total foreign debt to China. Additionally, the negotiations have been perceived as non-transparent, contracts were assigned to Chinese companies – and China insisted that in case of disputes the arbitration would be in Shanghai. Moreover, the import of construction-material was excluded from taxation. China also acquired the Smederevo Steel Manufacturing in Serbia and built the Pupin Bridge in Belgrade. Another big project in Serbia is the Belgrade-Budapest railway which in combination makes Serbia the most important partner in the region for China. In Albania, Chinese privately-owned Geo-Jade Petroleum bought the Canadian company Bankers Petroleum which is the country`s largest oil producer. There are other big investments in infrastructure projects and in the energy sector in BiH and North-Macedonia.

Generally, Chinese investments in the region consist primarily of loans. The high expectations of the region, therefore, have not been met since Chinese foreign direct investments, which are comparably small anyway, did not really materialize in green-field developments, but rather in the acquisition of companies. The high debt of Montenegro puts it in a specific situation of vulnerability even though China delayed the first payback, which was due in July 2021, considering the economic difficulties with which Montenegro is confronted since the outbreak of the Covid-19 health crisis. China, therefore, is a “lending-power” not an “investment-power”.

Political and soft-power relations

Even though the Chinese approach towards the region is mostly economically driven, there is also a political side to the investments – for China and the region itself. Serbia, who is the most important partner to China builds upon a longer relationship. China does not accept Kosovo`s independence and the (unintentional) bombing of the Chinese Embassy in 1999 by NATO brought the countries closer together – already before the One Belt One Road initiative was introduced. In exchange, China is looking for support in the international arena when it comes to its disputed behavior in the South-China Sea, relations with Taiwan (which is not recognized by Serbia), the situation in Hong Kong and the treatment of the Uyghur population in Xinjiang. Western Balkan countries generally refrain from official statements condemning Chinese behavior in the above-mentioned contexts in the hope of future investments.  

When the EU and the rest of the world was hit by the pandemic in 2020 followed by an export-ban of medical supplies, Serbia’s president Alexander Vučić took advantage of the general disappointment. He openly criticized the lack of solidarity of the EU, praised China and declared that Serbia would turn to China, who, as he argued, was ‘the only one who can help’. When doctors arrived in Belgrade from Beijing, Vučić kissed the Chinese flag, a picture which ended up on the front pages of Serbian media. Shortly afterwards, the EU announced it would provide Serbia with US$18 million in immediate medical support and US$94m in social and economic aid – far more than China gave and without a big media campaign. Serbia therefore tries to balance its interests and its negotiation position towards the West by having close ties to China, but also to Russia with which it has a long-lasting historical cooperation.

Another quite new Chinese approach in the region is trying to foster its image as a well-intentioned partner by setting up Confucius Institutes in all WB6, memorandums of understanding, building of schools and academic exchange. China is also setting up media cooperation to promote a win-win collaboration and to influence the public opinion towards the One Belt One Road Initiative. Moreover, China organizes study trips and cultural events which tend to become more institutionalized and finally part of its cultural diplomacy strategy. These developments have gained attention only recently and admittedly, they started from a very low base considering that China is culturally and historically far away from the region. But even if these activities show the multilayered approach China pursues in the Western Balkans, its relevance should not be overstated. The European Union does have far more leverage in this context, its relations are much more institutionalized, and the EU and NATO aspirations are still very high on the political agenda but also when it comes to the public opinion.

What does China’s presence in the Balkans mean for the EU?

China already became the third most important actor in the Western Balkans and the EU should not ignore China’s influence. China, contrarily to Russia, is not opposing the EU-path of the Western Balkan countries simply because the EU prospect creates more stability in the region which is important for Chinese investments. Even though China is trying to promote within the region, it has no strategy of exporting its ideology. The main goal is still to export goods to the EU and Central and Eastern European states via different routes using its main foreign policy tool – the 1B1R initiative. Expectations of a positive outcome of Chinese investments have been high in the region, but criticism from civil society organizations concerning corruption, environmental impact, and lack of transparency in public procurement, along with the lack of real foreign direct investments in greenfield developments, have curtailed the initial euphoria about China. Nevertheless, the region can profit from infrastructure projects. Chinese fundings are not a problem per se since investments are definitely needed. It can only be problematic when it hinders the EU path, when EU requirements are not met and when it – even if unintentionally – gives room for corrupt policies and if it hinders important reforms in rule of law. Especially important is the environmental situation considering that the Western Balkans are one of the most polluted regions in Europe. China does have an own energy policy which takes the climate crisis into account, and it also supports the Paris agreement. Yet, its investments in hydro and coal-fired power plants in the WB are detrimental to environmental protection and do affect the EU directly (pollution of its neighborhood) and indirectly (environmental migration). China eventually could have a positive influence on environmental protection by greening Chinese foreign infrastructure investments.

For the European Union, the Western Balkans are way more than an economic tool to boost trade. The EU has close historical, political, people-to-people, and economic ties with the region. The WB6 countries are encircled by EU countries, and the EU integration is still not contested by any member state, even though sometimes there are bilateral considerations which hinder the accession process. Additionally, they are also important for European security since it is the closes neighbor of the EU. The “no” of France, Denmark, and the Netherlands in 2019 to open accession negotiations with Albania and North Macedonia after they had introduced/carried out significant reforms, was a result of domestic considerations and left the population disappointed (in March 2020, Albania and North Macedonia were granted with the opening of accession talks). In order to be seen as a credible partner, the EU needs to stick to its commitments in its own interest and the interest of its neighboring region. Only if the EU manages to keep up its transformative power when it comes to its fundamental values, it can pave the way to change the countries into liberal and prosperous democracies based on rule of law and market economy.

A Way Forward?

The EU should have a pragmatic approach when it comes to China. Chinese investment can be beneficial to Europe if China also respects European interests – especially in the field of environment, human rights, and rule of law. The EU should enhance cooperation with China but on mutually beneficial terms. The EU Strategy on China states that the EU’s engagement with China will be principled, practical, and pragmatic, staying true to its interests and values. It could incorporate China-specific goals also in its enlargement policy and it can support civil society organizations which tackle aspects like environmental protection, workers-rights or fight against corruption. It is also important to use its political leverage when it comes to the fundamental values (art. 2 EUV) on which the EU is built upon: “The Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. These values are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail.”

Even though China does have an increased presence in the Western Balkans it is important to take note that the influence and investments of the EU does exceed those of China on a large scale and holistically. Unfortunately, the EU seems not to be able to make its engagement mor visible which opens room for other actors to fill this gap. Europe needs to reconsider its public diplomacy strategy. People in the region and within the European Union should be able to see and acknowledge the positive impacts EU-funding, its political leverage and its investments do have in the region. Support of independent Civil Society organizations can be one way to put pressure on political elites, but also official diplomatic relations – bi- and multilateral – should play a role to hold stakeholders responsible for their actions.

Yet, even if the EU is confronted on many different levels with internal and external challenges, it is not only the EU – or other third actors like China, Russia, or Turkey – who is responsible for the transformation of the Western Balkan countries into prosperous democracies. The first and most important actors are the leaders and governments in the region who, unfortunately, sometimes put their own good before the benefits of the society. Pressure on media freedom, corruption, nationalism and clientelism are just some of the internal problems, which hinder the path towards EU integration. So, frustration with the governing elites but also with the seemingly unwillingness of the EU to be tough on reforms while not pushing the region away is becoming a big concern for many civil society organizations working for a democratic region based on the rule of law.

It is very true that China can be a partner, but it is also important to understand that the main actors in the region for responsible policies are the people in power, the respective governments, its leaders, and in the end – not China. It is not another new Cold War what is needed, but pragmatism and partnership wherever it is possible – in line with the EUs values-  to close the socioeconomic gap between the EU and its neighbors.

IF YOU VALUE THE INSTITUTE OF NEW EUROPE’S WORK, BECOME ONE OF ITS DONORS!

Funds received will allow us to finance further publications.

You can contribute by making donations to INE’s bank account:

95 2530 0008 2090 1053 7214 0001

with the following payment title: „darowizna na cele statutowe”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-Mail
Stephanie Fenkart Mag. Stephanie Fenkart MA. Director of the International Institute for Peace (IIP) since 2016. She has an MA in Development Studies from the University of Vienna and an MA in Human Rights from the Danube University, Krems. She is furthermore a member of the Advisory Committee for Strategy and Security Policy of the Scientific Commission at the Austrian Armed Forces (BMLV). She is also a board member of the NGO Committee for Peace, Vienna.

Related Posts

See All Publications
  • Europe, News, Publications, Serbia, The Balkans

Jakub Bielamowicz comments for TRT World on local elections in northern Kosovo boycotted by Kosovo Serbs [Video]

Our Balkans analyst Jakub Bielamowicz comments for Turkish TRT World on the results of local elections in northern Kosovo, which…
  • Jakub Bielamowicz
  • April 24, 2023
  • Analysis, Indo-Pacific, North Korea, Publications, South Korea

The sinusoid of South Korea’s foreign relations with North Korea in light of the nuclear issue – what lies ahead?

Nuclear development in North Korea is the most often raised issue within Inter-Korean relations. Considering the mercurial nature of the…
  • Agnieszka Lewczuk
  • April 7, 2023
  • Publications, Reports, Security, Ukraine

The [Ninth] Year of The Russo-Ukrainian War. INE Analysis

One year after Russia's full-scale aggression against Ukraine, we present you an in-depth analysis in which Aleksy Borówka (in cooperation…
  • Aleksy Borówka
  • April 6, 2023
See All Publications

Comments are closed.

Stephanie Fenkart Mag. Stephanie Fenkart MA. Director of the International Institute for Peace (IIP) since 2016. She has an MA in Development Studies from the University of Vienna and an MA in Human Rights from the Danube University, Krems. She is furthermore a member of the Advisory Committee for Strategy and Security Policy of the Scientific Commission at the Austrian Armed Forces (BMLV). She is also a board member of the NGO Committee for Peace, Vienna.
Program Europa tworzą:

Marcin Chruściel

Dyrektor programu. Absolwent studiów doktoranckich z zakresu nauk o polityce na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim, magister stosunków międzynarodowych i europeistyki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prezes Zarządu Instytutu Nowej Europy.

dr Artur Bartoszewicz

Przewodniczący Rady Programowej Instytutu Nowej Europy. Doktor nauk ekonomicznych Szkoły Głównej Handlowej. Ekspert w dziedzinie polityki publicznej, w tym m. in. strategii państwa i gospodarki.

Michał Banasiak

Specjalizuje się w relacjach sportu i polityki. Autor analiz, komentarzy i wywiadów z zakresu dyplomacji sportowej i polityki międzynarodowej. Były dziennikarz Polsat News i wysłannik redakcji zagranicznej Telewizji Polskiej.

Maciej Pawłowski

Ekspert ds. migracji, gospodarki i polityki państw basenu Morza Śródziemnego. W latach 2018-2020 Analityk PISM ds. Południowej Europy. Autor publikacji w polskiej i zagranicznej prasie na temat Hiszpanii, Włoch, Grecji, Egiptu i państw Magrebu. Od września 2020 r. mieszka w północnej Afryce (Egipt, Algieria).

Jędrzej Błaszczak

Absolwent studiów prawniczych Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Katowicach. Jego zainteresowania badawcze koncentrują się na Inicjatywie Trójmorza i polityce w Bułgarii. Doświadczenie zdobywał w European Foundation of Human Rights w Wilnie, Center for the Study of Democracy w Sofii i polskich placówkach dyplomatycznych w Teheranie i Tbilisi.

Program Bezpieczeństwo tworzą:

dr Aleksander Olech

Dyrektor programu. Wykładowca na Baltic Defence College, absolwent Europejskiej Akademii Dyplomacji oraz Akademii Sztuki Wojennej. Jego główne zainteresowania badawcze to terroryzm, bezpieczeństwo w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej oraz rola NATO i UE w środowisku zagrożeń hybrydowych.

dr Agnieszka Rogozińska

Członek Rady Programowej Instytutu Nowej Europy. Doktor nauk społecznych w dyscyplinie nauki o polityce. Zainteresowania badawcze koncentruje na problematyce bezpieczeństwa euroatlantyckiego, instytucjonalnym wymiarze bezpieczeństwa i współczesnych zagrożeniach.

Aleksy Borówka

Doktorant na Wydziale Nauk Społecznych Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Przewodniczący Krajowej Reprezentacji Doktorantów w kadencji 2020. Autor kilkunastu prac naukowych, poświęconych naukom o bezpieczeństwie, naukom o polityce i administracji oraz stosunkom międzynarodowym. Laureat I, II oraz III Międzynarodowej Olimpiady Geopolitycznej.

Karolina Siekierka

Absolwentka Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego na kierunku stosunki międzynarodowe, specjalizacji Bezpieczeństwo i Studia Strategiczne. Jej zainteresowania badawcze obejmują politykę zagraniczną i wewnętrzną Francji, prawa człowieka oraz konflikty zbrojne.

Stanisław Waszczykowski

Podoficer rezerwy, student studiów magisterskich na kierunku Bezpieczeństwo Międzynarodowe i Dyplomacja na Akademii Sztuki Wojennej, były praktykant w BBN. Jego zainteresowania badawcze obejmują m.in. operacje pokojowe ONZ oraz bezpieczeństwo Ukrainy.

Leon Pińczak

Student studiów drugiego stopnia na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim na kierunku stosunki międzynarodowe. Dziennikarz polskojęzycznej redakcji Biełsatu. Zawodowo zajmuje się obszarem postsowieckim, rosyjską polityką wewnętrzną i doktrynami FR. Biegle włada językiem rosyjskim.

Program Indo-Pacyfik tworzą:

Łukasz Kobierski

Dyrektor programu. Współzałożyciel INE oraz prezes zarządu w latach 2019-2021. Stypendysta szkoleń z zakresu bezpieczeństwa na Daniel Morgan Graduate School of National Security w Waszyngtonie, ekspert od stosunków międzynarodowych. Absolwent Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego oraz Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. Wiceprezes Zarządu INE.

dr Joanna Siekiera

Prawnik międzynarodowy, doktor nauk społecznych, adiunkt na Wydziale Prawa Uniwersytetu w Bergen w Norwegii. Była stypendystką rządu Nowej Zelandii na Uniwersytecie Victorii w Wellington, niemieckiego Institute of Cultural Diplomacy, a także francuskiego Institut de relations internationales et stratégiques.

Paweł Paszak

Absolwent stosunków międzynarodowych (spec. Wschodnioazjatycka) na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim oraz stypendysta University of Kent (W. Brytania) i Hainan University (ChRL). Doktorant UW i Akademii Sztuki Wojennej. Jego zainteresowania badawcze obejmują politykę zagraniczną ChRL oraz strategiczną rywalizację Chiny-USA.

Jakub Graca

Magister stosunków międzynarodowych na Uniwersytecie Jagiellońskim; studiował także filologię orientalną (specjalność: arabistyka). Analityk Centrum Inicjatyw Międzynarodowych (Warszawa) oraz Instytutu Nowej Europy. Zainteresowania badawcze: Stany Zjednoczone (z naciskiem na politykę zagraniczną), relacje transatlantyckie.

Patryk Szczotka

Absolwent filologii dalekowschodniej ze specjalnością chińską na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim oraz student kierunku double degree China and International Relations na Aalborg University oraz University of International Relations (国际关系学院) w Pekinie. Jego zainteresowania naukowe to relacje polityczne i gospodarcze UE-ChRL oraz dyplomacja.

The programme's team:

Marcin Chruściel

Programme director. Graduate of PhD studies in Political Science at the University of Wroclaw and Master studies in International Relations at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. President of the Management Board at the Institute of New Europe.

PhD Artur Bartoszewicz

Chairman of the Institute's Programme Board. Doctor of Economic Sciences at the SGH Warsaw School of Economics. Expert in the field of public policy, including state and economic strategies. Expert at the National Centre for Research and Development and the Digital Poland Projects Centre.

Michał Banasiak

He specializes in relationship of sports and politics. Author of analysis, comments and interviews in the field of sports diplomacy and international politics. Former Polsat News and Polish Television’s foreign desk journalist.

Maciej Pawłowski

Expert on migration, economics and politics of Mediterranean countries. In the period of 2018-2020 PISM Analyst on Southern Europe. Author of various articles in Polish and foreign press about Spain, Italy, Greece, Egypt and Maghreb countries. Since September 2020 lives in North Africa (Egypt, Algeria).

Jędrzej Błaszczak

Graduate of Law at the University of Silesia. His research interests focus on the Three Seas Initiative and politics in Bulgaria. He acquired experience at the European Foundation of Human Rights in Vilnius, the Center for the Study of Democracy in Sofia, and in Polish embassies in Tehran and Tbilisi.

PhD Aleksander Olech

Programme director. Visiting lecturer at the Baltic Defence College, graduate of the European Academy of Diplomacy and War Studies University. His main research interests include terrorism, international cooperation for security in Eastern Europe and the role of NATO and the EU with regard to hybrid threats.

PhD Agnieszka Rogozińska

Member of the Institute's Programme Board. Doctor of Social Sciences in the discipline of Political Science. Editorial secretary of the academic journals "Politics & Security" and "Independence: journal devoted to Poland's recent history". Her research interests focus on security issues.

Aleksy Borówka

PhD candidate at the Faculty of Social Sciences in the University of Wroclaw, the President of the Polish National Associations of PhD Candidates in 2020. The author of dozen of scientific papers, concerning security studies, political science, administration, international relations. Laureate of the I, II and III International Geopolitical Olympiad.

Karolina Siekierka

Graduate of International Relations specializing in Security and Strategic Studies at University of Warsaw. Erasmus student at the Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1) and the Institut d’Etudes Politique de Paris (Sciences Po Paris). Her research areas include human rights, climate change and armed conflicts.

Stanisław Waszczykowski

Reserve non-commissioned officer. Master's degree student in International Security and Diplomacy at the War Studies University in Warsaw, former trainee at the National Security Bureau. His research interests include issues related to UN peacekeeping operations and the security of Ukraine.

Leon Pińczak

A second-degree student at the University of Warsaw, majoring in international relations. A journalist of the Polish language edition of Belsat. Interested in the post-Soviet area, with a particular focus on Russian internal politics and Russian doctrines - foreign, defense and information-cybernetic.

Łukasz Kobierski

Programme director. Deputy President of the Management Board. Scholarship holder at the Daniel Morgan Graduate School of National Security in Washington and an expert in the field of international relations. Graduate of the University of Warsaw and the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

PhD Joanna Siekiera

International lawyer, Doctor of social sciences, postdoctor at the Faculty of Law, University of Bergen, Norway. She was a scholarship holder of the New Zealand government at the Victoria University of Wellington, Institute of Cultural Diplomacy in Germany, Institut de relations internationales et stratégiques in France.

Paweł Paszak

Graduate of International Relations (specialisation in East Asian Studies) from the University of Warsaw and scholarship holder at the University of Kent (UK) and Hainan University (China). PhD candidate at the University of Warsaw and the War Studies University. His research areas include the foreign policy of China and the strategic rivalry between China and the US in the Indo-Pacific.

Jakub Graca

Master of International Relations at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. He also studied Arabic therein. An analyst at the Center for International Initiatives (Warsaw) and the Institute of New Europe. Research interests: United States (mainly foreign policy), transatlantic relations.

Patryk Szczotka

A graduate of Far Eastern Philology with a specialization in China Studies at the University of Wroclaw and a student of a double degree “China and International Relations” at Aalborg University and University of International Relations (国际关系学院) in Beijing. His research interests include EU-China political and economic relations, as well as diplomacy.

Three Seas Think Tanks Hub is a platform of cooperation among different think tanks based in 3SI member countries. Their common goal is to strengthen public debate and understanding of the Three Seas region seen from the political, economic and security perspective. The project aims at exchanging ideas, research and publications on the region’s potential and challenges.

Members

The Baltic Security Foundation (Latvia)

The BSF promotes the security and defense of the Baltic Sea region. It gathers security experts from the region and beyond, provides a platform for discussion and research, promotes solutions that lead to stronger regional security in the military and other areas.

The Institute for Politics and Society (Czech Republic)

The Institute analyses important economic, political, and social areas that affect today’s society. The mission of the Institute is to cultivate the Czech political and public sphere through professional and open discussion.

Nézöpont Institute (Hungary)

The Institute aims at improving Hungarian public life and public discourse by providing real data, facts and opinions based on those. Its primary focus points are Hungarian youth, media policy and Central European cooperation.

The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (Austria)

The wiiw is one of the principal centres for research on Central, East and Southeast Europe with 50 years of experience. Over the years, the Institute has broadened its expertise, increasing its regional coverage – to European integration, the countries of Wider Europe and selected issues of the global economy.

The International Institute for Peace (Austria)

The Institute strives to address the most topical issues of the day and promote dialogue, public engagement, and a common understanding to ensure a holistic approach to conflict resolution and a durable peace. The IIP functions as a platform to promote peace and non-violent conflict resolution across the world.

The Institute for Regional and International Studies (Bulgaria)

The IRIS initiates, develops and implements civic strategies for democratic politics at the national, regional and international level. The Institute promotes the values of democracy, civil society, freedom and respect for law and assists the process of deepening Bulgarian integration in NATO and the EU.

The European Institute of Romania

EIR is a public institution whose mission is to provide expertise in the field of European Affairs to the public administration, the business community, the social partners and the civil society. EIR’s activity is focused on four key domains: research, training, communication, translation of the EHRC case-law.

The Institute of New Europe (Poland)

The Institute is an advisory and analytical non-governmental organisation active in the fields of international politics, international security and economics. The Institute supports policy-makers by providing them with expert opinions, as well as creating a platform for academics, publicists, and commentators to exchange ideas.

YouTube

Latest publications

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Jakub Bielamowicz comments for TRT World on local elections in northern Kosovo boycotted by Kosovo Serbs [Video]
    by Jakub Bielamowicz
    April 24, 2023
  • The sinusoid of South Korea’s foreign relations with North Korea in light of the nuclear issue – what lies ahead?
    by Agnieszka Lewczuk
    April 7, 2023
  • The [Ninth] Year of The Russo-Ukrainian War. INE Analysis
    by Aleksy Borówka
    April 6, 2023

Categories

THE MOST POPULAR TAGS:

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

China economy European Union International politics International security Poland Russia Security terrorism Ukraine USA

  • About
  • Publications
  • Europe
  • Security
  • O nas
  • Publikacje
  • Europa
  • Bezpieczeństwo
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
  • People
  • Contact – Careers
  • Indo-Pacyfik
  • Trójmorze
  • Ludzie
  • Kontakt – Kariera

Financed with funds from the National Freedom Institute - Center for Civil Society Development under the Governmental Civil Society Organisations Development Programme for 2018-2030.

Sfinansowano ze środków Narodowego Instytutu Wolności – Centrum Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Obywatelskiego w ramach Rządowego Programu Rozwoju Organizacji Obywatelskich na lata 2018-2030.



© 2019-2023 The Institute of New Europe Foundation · All rights reserved · Support us