Email · kontakt@ine.org.pl
Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe
  • About
  • Publications
      • Publications

        The primary categories of materials published by the Institute as part of its research and analytical activities.

      • SEE ALL PUBLICATIONS

      • Analyses
        Daily commentary and analysis on international issues provided by our experts and analysts
      • Reports
        Comprehensive thematic studies on international relations and socio-political issues
      • Video
        Recordings of expert debates and series of video podcasts created by our team and experts
      • Maps
        Selection of maps depicting international alliances and foreign visits of key politicians
  • Programmes
      • Programmes

        The main areas of research and publication activities at the Institute with separate teams of experts, functioning under the supervision of the head of a particular programme.

      • WEBSITE OF THE THREE SEAS PROJECT

      • Europe
        Analyses and commentaries on European integration and the place of Europe on the political and economic map of the world
      • Security
        Studies in the field of international and internal security of individual states, with particular emphasis on the role of NATO
      • Indo-Pacific
        An overview of the political and economic situation in the region, the status of the U.S.-China rivalry, and the EU’s policy towards China
      • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
        Analyses and studies of the Three Seas Initiative, taking into account the perspectives of the participating states
  • People
  • Contact-Careers
  • Polish-Czech Forum
  • Polski
Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe
  • About
  • Publications
      • Publications

        The primary categories of materials published by the Institute as part of its research and analytical activities.

      • SEE ALL PUBLICATIONS

      • Analyses
        Daily commentary and analysis on international issues provided by our experts and analysts
      • Reports
        Comprehensive thematic studies on international relations and socio-political issues
      • Video
        Recordings of expert debates and series of video podcasts created by our team and experts
      • Maps
        Selection of maps depicting international alliances and foreign visits of key politicians
  • Programmes
      • Programmes

        The main areas of research and publication activities at the Institute with separate teams of experts, functioning under the supervision of the head of a particular programme.

      • WEBSITE OF THE THREE SEAS PROJECT

      • Europe
        Analyses and commentaries on European integration and the place of Europe on the political and economic map of the world
      • Security
        Studies in the field of international and internal security of individual states, with particular emphasis on the role of NATO
      • Indo-Pacific
        An overview of the political and economic situation in the region, the status of the U.S.-China rivalry, and the EU’s policy towards China
      • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
        Analyses and studies of the Three Seas Initiative, taking into account the perspectives of the participating states
  • People
  • Contact-Careers
  • Polish-Czech Forum
  • Polski
Jul 26
China, European Union, Indo-Pacific, Publications

EU-China Affairs Review June 2025

July 26, 2025

Mikołaj Woźniak, Konrad Falkowski

3.06. Sefcovic-Wang meeting

On the sidelines of the World Trade Organization ministerial meeting in Paris, Maros Sefcovic, Commissioner for Trade and Economic Security, and Wang Wentao, Minister of Trade of the People’s Republic of China, held talks. After the meeting, Sefcovic announced that both sides “were working hard to address issues in their trade relationship,” especially ahead of the summit scheduled for July of this year. In addition to existing issues, such as electric cars from China and European brandy, the issue of China’s dominance over key minerals (rare earth elements) and the export restrictions imposed by the PRC in this regard was also raised.

However, a spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Commerce provided more information about the meeting itself, emphasizing that the talks were “focused, frank and in-depth” and covered “urgent and important issues such as the EU anti-subsidy case against China regarding electric vehicles, China’s anti-dumping case against EU brandy and export controls.”

Regarding Chinese electric vehicles, a spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Commerce stated that “consultations on price commitments between China and the EU on electric vehicles have now entered their final stages, but efforts from both sides are still needed.” What’s new is that the European side has proposed to simultaneously “explore new technical paths, and China will assess the feasibility of the EU proposal from a legal and technical perspective.”

In the case of Chinese tariffs on European Union brandy, the PRC reached a degree of agreement with interested French companies, which submitted applications for price commitments to the Chinese investigating authority. The spokesperson indicated that the applications were being analyzed and assessed, and a final verdict is expected by July 5, 2025.

Minister Wang also clarified the latest controversial issue, China’s export controls on rare earth metals. He emphasized that “the implementation of export controls on rare earth metals and other items is an internationally accepted practice.” At the same time, China understands the European Union’s concerns and is ready to establish “a green light for qualified applications to expedite the approval process.” Furthermore, he instructed his working group to maintain effective communication with the European side on this matter and hoped that the EU would “take effective measures to facilitate, safeguard, and promote the regulation-compliant trade of high-tech products with China.”

5.06. The Chinese Embassy in the Philippines responds to Kaja Kallas

At the turn of May and June, Kaja Kallas, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, undertook an official trip to Asia, during which she spoke at the IISS Asia Security Summit: The Shangri-La Dialogue. She then traveled to the Philippines, where she met with Foreign Minister Enrique Manalo and Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The purpose of the visit was to deepen cooperation in the field of security and defense. During a joint press statement, Kallas indirectly addressed the contentious issues in the South China Sea, saying: “European Union is a firm believer in international law […] We have UNCLOS [the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea], we have the maritime security arrangements and routes there. So, we reject any unilateral changes to the status quo, including use of coercion. And, of course, we are supporting all the partners who are believers of international law, and we are willing to defend the law as well, because if you do not defend the law, then the situation in the world and global sphere would be much, much different.”

As expected, these words did not go unnoticed by Beijing, which addressed the situation through its embassy in Manila. A spokesperson for the Chinese embassy responded to a request for comment with the following initial words: “China’s sovereignty, rights and interests in the South China Sea have been established in the long course of history, are solidly grounded in history and the law, and are consistent with international law including the UN Charter.” He further asserted that the disputes between China and the Philippines concern ” a matter of territorial sovereignty, which falls outside the scope of the UNCLOS,” and that the Arbitral Tribunal, which issued its 2016 statement regarding the South China Sea and the dispute there, violated “the principle of state consent, exercised its jurisdiction ultra vires [beyond its scope of authority], and rendered an award that disregards the law.” Therefore, China does not fully respect or accept this ruling, calling it illegal and invalid. He continued his statement by noting that the situation in the South China Sea “remains generally stable recently, and freedom of navigation and overflight in this area has never been an issue,” and that any tensions in these waters “are not caused by China.” He concluded by adding that the European Union has no right to interfere in the maritime disputes between China and the Philippines, as it is not a party to either conflict. Similarly, the EU’s criticism of China’s “legitimate efforts to safeguard its territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests” is unfounded in such a situation.

6.06. Barrot-Wang telephone conversation

French Minister of Europe and Foreign Affairs Jean-Noël Barrot held a telephone conversation with his Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi, on June 6, according to the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. According to the statement, Wang noted that both China and France highly value their independence by cultivating traditions of independence and broadly defined autonomy. This, in turn, leads to a situation in which both sides “must strengthen strategic mutual trust and respect each other’s fundamental interests,” the Chinese Foreign Minister said. He emphasized the Taiwan issue, calling it “China’s internal affair,” which Beijing sees as significantly affecting “China’s national sovereignty and territorial integrity,” making it a different issue from the war in Ukraine. Wang expressed hope that France will remain committed to the “one China” principle and “uphold the right position and oppose NATO’s interference in Asia-Pacific affairs.” He added that it is in the interests of both China and France to support a multilateral order in which free trade prevails and to oppose the politics of fear and unilateral intimidating actions.

Barrot, for his part, reaffirmed his country’s implementation of the “One China” policy and reaffirmed that “France always regards China as a friend and partner.” He also counts on maintaining and developing high-level bilateral relations. The French foreign minister stated that expanding people-to-people contacts and cultural exchanges are a “signal of opening up.” Furthermore, he opposed the initiation of trade and customs wars – in his opinion, consultations and dialogue are the proper way to resolve economic and trade disputes.

10.06. Han Zheng in Spain

From June 10 to 13, 2025, Vice President of the People’s Republic of China Han Zheng paid an official visit to Spain. The visit was connected with his participation in the UN Ocean Conference in Nice. This meeting held special significance in the context of strengthening relations between China and Spain, as well as with the European Union. Notably, it took place less than two months after Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s previous visit to Beijing, underscoring Spain’s growing role as a mediator between the EU and China.

The highlight of the visit was a meeting between Han Zheng and Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez on June 11 in Madrid. The discussions addressed key global challenges such as climate change, development financing, and tensions in international trade. Both sides emphasized their commitment to multilateralism, international law, and the role of the United Nations. Prime Minister Sánchez stressed the importance of a rules-based international order and free trade, warning of the consequences of global trade wars. In the context of the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the EU and China, both parties emphasized the need to build mutual trust and respect for shared values.

Special attention was also given to the 20th anniversary in 2025 of the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership between Spain and China. Building on Sánchez’s visit to Beijing several months earlier, both sides are implementing an Action Plan through 2028, covering cooperation in areas such as economy, agriculture, science, innovation, green energy, and cultural and educational exchange. Both Spain and China expressed a desire to strengthen political trust, collaborate in international organizations, and promote the development of advanced technologies such as e-mobility, photovoltaics, and green hydrogen.

On June 12, Han was received by King Felipe VI of Spain, to whom he conveyed greetings from President Xi Jinping. Their conversation addressed the development of economic relations, particularly in the fields of new energy, food industry, e-mobility, agriculture, and education. The two leaders also discussed the international situation, expressing their will to promote stability and peace, especially in the context of the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East.

Following meetings with Prime Minister Sánchez and King Felipe VI, Han traveled to Seville, where he met with Juan Manuel Moreno, the head of the Andalusian regional government. Last year, the region attracted Chinese investments exceeding 2.5 billion euros. According to forecasts by the Spanish tourism lobby Turespaña, the number of Chinese tourists visiting Spain this summer is expected to increase by 36% compared to the previous year. This would make Spain the fastest-growing travel destination in Europe among Chinese travelers. In the trade sector, the parties highlighted the benefits of recent decisions by Chinese authorities, such as the approval of additional Spanish pork products for import and the suspension of anti-dumping duties. These moves are seen as gestures of goodwill, fostering further development of bilateral economic relations.

16.06. Von der Leyen on China at the G7 Summit

During the 51st G7 Summit, held on June 16–17 in Canada, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also had her moment to speak. According to a statement published on the Commission’s website, the main focus of her speech was China. She mentioned China 16 times, first stating that “today, China dominates the global market for rare earth permanent magnets.” Von der Leyen views this situation as a threat to the development of free trade: “China is using this quasi-monopoly not only as a bargaining chip, but also weaponizing it to undermine competitors in key industries.” She added that everyone trading with China has “witnessed the cost and consequences of China’s coercion through export restrictions.” She warned that even if Beijing relaxes its restrictions, “the threat remains.” Another issue she raised was the so-called new “China shock” – a reference to the original “China shock” that followed China’s entry into the WTO in 2001, which led to a massive surge in Chinese exports. In this case – according to Von der Leyen – „as China’s economy slows down, Beijing floods global markets with subsidized overcapacity that its own market cannot absorb.” This form of new “shock” is now the leading threat to the global economy, she said. She also emphasized that, despite these challenges, Europe is not in favor of “decoupling”, but rather of “de-risking”, which leaves room for cooperation instead of total disengagement. That’s why, as she announced, Europe was the first to respond to Chinese subsidies in the automotive sector, especially in the e-mobility segment. Additionally, the European Union is working to update the framework for monitoring inbound and outbound investments to avoid bolstering the military or intelligence capabilities of systemic rivals. At this point, the Commission President called for coordinated efforts to counteract China’s leverage in rare earth resources. She cited an example from 2010, when: “China imposed a rare earth trade embargo on Japan, triggering a tenfold price spike.” Despite Japan’s response, China adapted by flooding the global market with cheap rare earth elements to eliminate competition. According to Von der Leyen: “This pattern of dominance, dependency and blackmail continues today.” That’s why she is appealing to: „create alternatives along the supply chain – from mining and refining to recycling and stockpiling – and ensure critical mass of demand.” What does this mean? It means a need for investment in new mining projects and processing capacities both in G7 countries and globally. Accordingly, there is a need to “build an alternative network of trusted suppliers.” Furthermore, Von der Leyen recommends a closer look at other industrial sectors where distortions are clearly visible – such as the steel and pharmaceutical industries. And to conclude, she said: “We need to act together on non-market policies and practices,” suggesting, for example, joint monitoring of activities in specific sectors. At the very end, she called for stronger unity within the G7, stating: “We have a shared stake in economic security. The challenges we face are common. And the best responses are those we shape together”.

16.06. Lithuania without Chinese diplomats

It seemed that the diplomatic conflict between Vilnius and Beijing, ongoing since 2021, would gradually de-escalate in the current year, especially given such announcements from the new Lithuanian administration. However, at the end of 2024, Lithuania ordered three Chinese diplomats to leave its territory, accusing them of espionage. In April, during the EU-China Affairs Review, we cited statements from the Lithuanian Minister of Economy, who admitted that economic relations with Beijing are at a minimal level. Now, in June 2025, the Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs reports that “as of now, there are no diplomats or staff members accredited to work at the People’s Republic of China Embassy in Vilnius.” According to reports from outlets BNS and LRT, as of mid-May, only one Chinese diplomat remained in Lithuania, but “after a brief trip abroad, he was refused re-entry on May 18 at Vilnius Airport.” The reasons for the denial were lack of valid accreditation and exceeding the 90-day visa-free stay limit under Schengen regulations. Spokesperson for the State Border Guard Service, Giedrius Mišutis, commented on the matter: This person had exhausted the allowable time and could no longer rely on this exemption [accreditation].” Thus, the process of repairing bilateral relations between Lithuania and China is proving even more difficult than before. At this time, there is no news of any planned high-level meeting between Lithuanian and Chinese representatives. Perhaps the current situation will eventually force such developments in the near future—assuming a mutual willingness to restore proper relations.

23.06. Kaja Kallas on China at the Foreign Affairs Council (FAC)

On June 23, the monthly session of the Foreign Affairs Council (FAC) took place. This body brings together the foreign ministers of all European Union member states, chaired by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.

According to the briefing issued after the meeting, the Council’s most pressing concern remains Russia and its aggression against Ukraine. Nevertheless, the second top priority topic was identified as relations with the People’s Republic of China. The third major concern was the dangerously escalating situation in the Middle East. Returning to the topic of China, the Council concluded that Beijing’s actions—such as China’s support for Russia and its aggression towards Ukraine, as well as hybrid operations (e.g., cyberattacks)—pose a threat to the security of the entire European Union. During her press conference, High Representative Kaja Kallas began by emphasizing that: “It is clear that China is one of the largest trading partners, and we have a few issues like climate change where we cooperate, but every relationship requires a dose of realism.” She then added bluntly: „China enables Russia’s war”. Moreover, China’s hybrid activities—including cyberattacks, interference in European democracy, and coercive trade practices—are significantly complicating the ability to continue relations in the previous, less confrontational and more partnership-oriented, business-focused manner. Kallas noted that hearing the views of the member states’ foreign ministers was of great importance ahead of the upcoming EU–China summit in July 2025.

26.06. Czechs Reveal Chinese Plot to Intimidate Taiwan’s Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim

In March 2024, during the visit of Taiwanese Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim to Prague (covered in more detail in last year’s Review), the Chinese embassy in the Czech Republic carried out an organized intelligence operation, according to a report published on June 26 by Czech news outlet iROZHLAS.cz. Based on findings from Czech military intelligence (Vojenské zpravodajství), diplomats from the military-aviation department of the Chinese embassy tailed Vice President Hsiao from the moment she arrived in the country. Their goal was to gather intelligence about her travel itinerary, meetings with Czech officials – including Senate Speaker Miloš Vystrčil – and to intimidate her.

The Chinese diplomats not only trailed Hsiao’s motorcade, but also violated traffic laws, including running a red light in downtown Prague. Intelligence officials assessed this as a deliberate act, not an accident. Moreover, a “demonstrative kinetic action” was reportedly being prepared as an intimidation tactic – though it was never carried out.

Czech military intelligence informed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the incident, describing the actions of the Chinese embassy as unprecedented in a European context. A military intelligence spokesperson labeled the diplomats’ actions as a gross violation of obligations under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. The targeted victim, Vice President Hsiao, addressed the situation in a post on the platform X, writing: “I had a great visit to Prague & thank the Czech authorities for their hospitality & ensuring my safety. The CCP’s unlawful activities will NOT intimidate me from voicing Taiwan’s interests in the international community.” Czech Senate Speaker Miloš Vystrčil, who hosted the vice president’s visit, also responded: “I consider this a great impropriety. I don’t think it’s acceptable. We should respond as a sovereign and confident state. But this lies within the competence of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which must think this through carefully. We must realize that we live in a much more dangerous world than before.”

The Chinese side addressed the issue through Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun during a press conference on June 27. Guo stated that, in Beijing’s view, Prague had “seriously violated the One China Principle” and “grossly interfered in China’s internal affairs” by allowing Hsiao’s official visit. He referred to her using terms like “diehard Taiwan independence separatist.” Guo added that Chinese diplomats respect and comply with local laws and regulations in host countries. He urged relevant parties to “avoid being incited or used by Taiwan independence forces, and refrain from creating troubles, spreading rumors, and disrupting and undermining the bilateral relations.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-Mail
Mikołaj Woźniak Mikołaj Woźniak. Graduated in international relations from Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan. His research interests revolve around the foreign policy of contemporary powers, their impact on current international relations and the development of the international system after the end of the Cold War.

Related Posts

See All Publications
  • China, European Union, Indo-Pacific, Publications

EU-China Affairs Review January 2026

Mikołaj Woźniak, Karolina Czarnowska 1.01. China warns EU against restrictions on carbon emissions trading The Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM)…
  • Mikołaj Woźniak
  • February 16, 2026
  • Europe, Publications, Russia

Russia Affairs Review January 2026

Ksawery Stawiński, Kateryna Vasylyk 6.01 – Major Demographic Crisis in RussiaDuring the annual international conference “Foundry Council” in Chelyabinsk, renowned…
  • Ksawery Stawiński
  • February 16, 2026
  • Africa and Middle East, Analysis, Publications

Overview of Events in the Middle East – December 2025

Israel–Lebanon Relations: Status as of December 2025 Beirut, December 1–31 Since October 2024, a ceasefire has been in effect between…
  • Kasjusz Matyjasek
  • January 31, 2026
See All Publications

Comments are closed.

Mikołaj Woźniak Mikołaj Woźniak. Graduated in international relations from Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan. His research interests revolve around the foreign policy of contemporary powers, their impact on current international relations and the development of the international system after the end of the Cold War.
Program Europa tworzą:

Marcin Chruściel

Dyrektor programu. Absolwent studiów doktoranckich z zakresu nauk o polityce na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim, magister stosunków międzynarodowych i europeistyki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prezes Zarządu Instytutu Nowej Europy.

dr Artur Bartoszewicz

Przewodniczący Rady Programowej Instytutu Nowej Europy. Doktor nauk ekonomicznych Szkoły Głównej Handlowej. Ekspert w dziedzinie polityki publicznej, w tym m. in. strategii państwa i gospodarki.

Michał Banasiak

Specjalizuje się w relacjach sportu i polityki. Autor analiz, komentarzy i wywiadów z zakresu dyplomacji sportowej i polityki międzynarodowej. Były dziennikarz Polsat News i wysłannik redakcji zagranicznej Telewizji Polskiej.

Maciej Pawłowski

Ekspert ds. migracji, gospodarki i polityki państw basenu Morza Śródziemnego. W latach 2018-2020 Analityk PISM ds. Południowej Europy. Autor publikacji w polskiej i zagranicznej prasie na temat Hiszpanii, Włoch, Grecji, Egiptu i państw Magrebu. Od września 2020 r. mieszka w północnej Afryce (Egipt, Algieria).

Jędrzej Błaszczak

Absolwent studiów prawniczych Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Katowicach. Jego zainteresowania badawcze koncentrują się na Inicjatywie Trójmorza i polityce w Bułgarii. Doświadczenie zdobywał w European Foundation of Human Rights w Wilnie, Center for the Study of Democracy w Sofii i polskich placówkach dyplomatycznych w Teheranie i Tbilisi.

Program Bezpieczeństwo tworzą:

dr Aleksander Olech

Dyrektor programu. Wykładowca na Baltic Defence College, absolwent Europejskiej Akademii Dyplomacji oraz Akademii Sztuki Wojennej. Jego główne zainteresowania badawcze to terroryzm, bezpieczeństwo w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej oraz rola NATO i UE w środowisku zagrożeń hybrydowych.

dr Agnieszka Rogozińska

Członek Rady Programowej Instytutu Nowej Europy. Doktor nauk społecznych w dyscyplinie nauki o polityce. Zainteresowania badawcze koncentruje na problematyce bezpieczeństwa euroatlantyckiego, instytucjonalnym wymiarze bezpieczeństwa i współczesnych zagrożeniach.

Aleksy Borówka

Doktorant na Wydziale Nauk Społecznych Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Przewodniczący Krajowej Reprezentacji Doktorantów w kadencji 2020. Autor kilkunastu prac naukowych, poświęconych naukom o bezpieczeństwie, naukom o polityce i administracji oraz stosunkom międzynarodowym. Laureat I, II oraz III Międzynarodowej Olimpiady Geopolitycznej.

Karolina Siekierka

Absolwentka Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego na kierunku stosunki międzynarodowe, specjalizacji Bezpieczeństwo i Studia Strategiczne. Jej zainteresowania badawcze obejmują politykę zagraniczną i wewnętrzną Francji, prawa człowieka oraz konflikty zbrojne.

Stanisław Waszczykowski

Podoficer rezerwy, student studiów magisterskich na kierunku Bezpieczeństwo Międzynarodowe i Dyplomacja na Akademii Sztuki Wojennej, były praktykant w BBN. Jego zainteresowania badawcze obejmują m.in. operacje pokojowe ONZ oraz bezpieczeństwo Ukrainy.

Leon Pińczak

Student studiów drugiego stopnia na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim na kierunku stosunki międzynarodowe. Dziennikarz polskojęzycznej redakcji Biełsatu. Zawodowo zajmuje się obszarem postsowieckim, rosyjską polityką wewnętrzną i doktrynami FR. Biegle włada językiem rosyjskim.

Program Indo-Pacyfik tworzą:

Łukasz Kobierski

Dyrektor programu. Współzałożyciel INE oraz prezes zarządu w latach 2019-2021. Stypendysta szkoleń z zakresu bezpieczeństwa na Daniel Morgan Graduate School of National Security w Waszyngtonie, ekspert od stosunków międzynarodowych. Absolwent Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego oraz Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. Wiceprezes Zarządu INE.

dr Joanna Siekiera

Prawnik międzynarodowy, doktor nauk społecznych, adiunkt na Wydziale Prawa Uniwersytetu w Bergen w Norwegii. Była stypendystką rządu Nowej Zelandii na Uniwersytecie Victorii w Wellington, niemieckiego Institute of Cultural Diplomacy, a także francuskiego Institut de relations internationales et stratégiques.

Paweł Paszak

Absolwent stosunków międzynarodowych (spec. Wschodnioazjatycka) na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim oraz stypendysta University of Kent (W. Brytania) i Hainan University (ChRL). Doktorant UW i Akademii Sztuki Wojennej. Jego zainteresowania badawcze obejmują politykę zagraniczną ChRL oraz strategiczną rywalizację Chiny-USA.

Jakub Graca

Magister stosunków międzynarodowych na Uniwersytecie Jagiellońskim; studiował także filologię orientalną (specjalność: arabistyka). Analityk Centrum Inicjatyw Międzynarodowych (Warszawa) oraz Instytutu Nowej Europy. Zainteresowania badawcze: Stany Zjednoczone (z naciskiem na politykę zagraniczną), relacje transatlantyckie.

Patryk Szczotka

Absolwent filologii dalekowschodniej ze specjalnością chińską na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim oraz student kierunku double degree China and International Relations na Aalborg University oraz University of International Relations (国际关系学院) w Pekinie. Jego zainteresowania naukowe to relacje polityczne i gospodarcze UE-ChRL oraz dyplomacja.

The programme's team:

Marcin Chruściel

Programme director. Graduate of PhD studies in Political Science at the University of Wroclaw and Master studies in International Relations at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. President of the Management Board at the Institute of New Europe.

PhD Artur Bartoszewicz

Chairman of the Institute's Programme Board. Doctor of Economic Sciences at the SGH Warsaw School of Economics. Expert in the field of public policy, including state and economic strategies. Expert at the National Centre for Research and Development and the Digital Poland Projects Centre.

Michał Banasiak

He specializes in relationship of sports and politics. Author of analysis, comments and interviews in the field of sports diplomacy and international politics. Former Polsat News and Polish Television’s foreign desk journalist.

Maciej Pawłowski

Expert on migration, economics and politics of Mediterranean countries. In the period of 2018-2020 PISM Analyst on Southern Europe. Author of various articles in Polish and foreign press about Spain, Italy, Greece, Egypt and Maghreb countries. Since September 2020 lives in North Africa (Egypt, Algeria).

Jędrzej Błaszczak

Graduate of Law at the University of Silesia. His research interests focus on the Three Seas Initiative and politics in Bulgaria. He acquired experience at the European Foundation of Human Rights in Vilnius, the Center for the Study of Democracy in Sofia, and in Polish embassies in Tehran and Tbilisi.

PhD Aleksander Olech

Programme director. Visiting lecturer at the Baltic Defence College, graduate of the European Academy of Diplomacy and War Studies University. His main research interests include terrorism, international cooperation for security in Eastern Europe and the role of NATO and the EU with regard to hybrid threats.

PhD Agnieszka Rogozińska

Member of the Institute's Programme Board. Doctor of Social Sciences in the discipline of Political Science. Editorial secretary of the academic journals "Politics & Security" and "Independence: journal devoted to Poland's recent history". Her research interests focus on security issues.

Aleksy Borówka

PhD candidate at the Faculty of Social Sciences in the University of Wroclaw, the President of the Polish National Associations of PhD Candidates in 2020. The author of dozen of scientific papers, concerning security studies, political science, administration, international relations. Laureate of the I, II and III International Geopolitical Olympiad.

Karolina Siekierka

Graduate of International Relations specializing in Security and Strategic Studies at University of Warsaw. Erasmus student at the Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1) and the Institut d’Etudes Politique de Paris (Sciences Po Paris). Her research areas include human rights, climate change and armed conflicts.

Stanisław Waszczykowski

Reserve non-commissioned officer. Master's degree student in International Security and Diplomacy at the War Studies University in Warsaw, former trainee at the National Security Bureau. His research interests include issues related to UN peacekeeping operations and the security of Ukraine.

Leon Pińczak

A second-degree student at the University of Warsaw, majoring in international relations. A journalist of the Polish language edition of Belsat. Interested in the post-Soviet area, with a particular focus on Russian internal politics and Russian doctrines - foreign, defense and information-cybernetic.

Łukasz Kobierski

Programme director. Deputy President of the Management Board. Scholarship holder at the Daniel Morgan Graduate School of National Security in Washington and an expert in the field of international relations. Graduate of the University of Warsaw and the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

PhD Joanna Siekiera

International lawyer, Doctor of social sciences, postdoctor at the Faculty of Law, University of Bergen, Norway. She was a scholarship holder of the New Zealand government at the Victoria University of Wellington, Institute of Cultural Diplomacy in Germany, Institut de relations internationales et stratégiques in France.

Paweł Paszak

Graduate of International Relations (specialisation in East Asian Studies) from the University of Warsaw and scholarship holder at the University of Kent (UK) and Hainan University (China). PhD candidate at the University of Warsaw and the War Studies University. His research areas include the foreign policy of China and the strategic rivalry between China and the US in the Indo-Pacific.

Jakub Graca

Master of International Relations at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. He also studied Arabic therein. An analyst at the Center for International Initiatives (Warsaw) and the Institute of New Europe. Research interests: United States (mainly foreign policy), transatlantic relations.

Patryk Szczotka

A graduate of Far Eastern Philology with a specialization in China Studies at the University of Wroclaw and a student of a double degree “China and International Relations” at Aalborg University and University of International Relations (国际关系学院) in Beijing. His research interests include EU-China political and economic relations, as well as diplomacy.

Three Seas Think Tanks Hub is a platform of cooperation among different think tanks based in 3SI member countries. Their common goal is to strengthen public debate and understanding of the Three Seas region seen from the political, economic and security perspective. The project aims at exchanging ideas, research and publications on the region’s potential and challenges.

Members

The Baltic Security Foundation (Latvia)

The BSF promotes the security and defense of the Baltic Sea region. It gathers security experts from the region and beyond, provides a platform for discussion and research, promotes solutions that lead to stronger regional security in the military and other areas.

The Institute for Politics and Society (Czech Republic)

The Institute analyses important economic, political, and social areas that affect today’s society. The mission of the Institute is to cultivate the Czech political and public sphere through professional and open discussion.

Nézöpont Institute (Hungary)

The Institute aims at improving Hungarian public life and public discourse by providing real data, facts and opinions based on those. Its primary focus points are Hungarian youth, media policy and Central European cooperation.

The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (Austria)

The wiiw is one of the principal centres for research on Central, East and Southeast Europe with 50 years of experience. Over the years, the Institute has broadened its expertise, increasing its regional coverage – to European integration, the countries of Wider Europe and selected issues of the global economy.

The International Institute for Peace (Austria)

The Institute strives to address the most topical issues of the day and promote dialogue, public engagement, and a common understanding to ensure a holistic approach to conflict resolution and a durable peace. The IIP functions as a platform to promote peace and non-violent conflict resolution across the world.

The Institute for Regional and International Studies (Bulgaria)

The IRIS initiates, develops and implements civic strategies for democratic politics at the national, regional and international level. The Institute promotes the values of democracy, civil society, freedom and respect for law and assists the process of deepening Bulgarian integration in NATO and the EU.

The European Institute of Romania

EIR is a public institution whose mission is to provide expertise in the field of European Affairs to the public administration, the business community, the social partners and the civil society. EIR’s activity is focused on four key domains: research, training, communication, translation of the EHRC case-law.

The Institute of New Europe (Poland)

The Institute is an advisory and analytical non-governmental organisation active in the fields of international politics, international security and economics. The Institute supports policy-makers by providing them with expert opinions, as well as creating a platform for academics, publicists, and commentators to exchange ideas.

YouTube

Latest publications

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • EU-China Affairs Review January 2026
    by Mikołaj Woźniak
    February 16, 2026
  • Russia Affairs Review January 2026
    by Ksawery Stawiński
    February 16, 2026
  • Overview of Events in the Middle East – December 2025
    by Kasjusz Matyjasek
    January 31, 2026

Categories

THE MOST POPULAR TAGS:

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

China European Union International politics International security Map Middle East Poland Russia Security Ukraine USA

  • About
  • Publications
  • Europe
  • Security
  • O nas
  • Publikacje
  • Europa
  • Bezpieczeństwo
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
  • People
  • Contact – Careers
  • Indo-Pacyfik
  • Trójmorze
  • Ludzie
  • Kontakt – Kariera

Financed with funds from the National Freedom Institute - Center for Civil Society Development under the Governmental Civil Society Organisations Development Programme for 2018-2030.

Sfinansowano ze środków Narodowego Instytutu Wolności – Centrum Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Obywatelskiego w ramach Rządowego Programu Rozwoju Organizacji Obywatelskich na lata 2018-2030.



© 2019-2024 The Institute of New Europe Foundation · All rights reserved · Support us