Email · kontakt@ine.org.pl
Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe
  • About
  • Publications
      • Publications

        The primary categories of materials published by the Institute as part of its research and analytical activities.

      • SEE ALL PUBLICATIONS

      • Analyses
        Daily commentary and analysis on international issues provided by our experts and analysts
      • Reports
        Comprehensive thematic studies on international relations and socio-political issues
      • Video
        Recordings of expert debates and series of video podcasts created by our team and experts
      • Maps
        Selection of maps depicting international alliances and foreign visits of key politicians
  • Programmes
      • Programmes

        The main areas of research and publication activities at the Institute with separate teams of experts, functioning under the supervision of the head of a particular programme.

      • WEBSITE OF THE THREE SEAS PROJECT

      • Europe
        Analyses and commentaries on European integration and the place of Europe on the political and economic map of the world
      • Security
        Studies in the field of international and internal security of individual states, with particular emphasis on the role of NATO
      • Indo-Pacific
        An overview of the political and economic situation in the region, the status of the U.S.-China rivalry, and the EU’s policy towards China
      • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
        Analyses and studies of the Three Seas Initiative, taking into account the perspectives of the participating states
  • People
  • Contact-Careers
  • Polish-Czech Forum
  • Polski
Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe
  • About
  • Publications
      • Publications

        The primary categories of materials published by the Institute as part of its research and analytical activities.

      • SEE ALL PUBLICATIONS

      • Analyses
        Daily commentary and analysis on international issues provided by our experts and analysts
      • Reports
        Comprehensive thematic studies on international relations and socio-political issues
      • Video
        Recordings of expert debates and series of video podcasts created by our team and experts
      • Maps
        Selection of maps depicting international alliances and foreign visits of key politicians
  • Programmes
      • Programmes

        The main areas of research and publication activities at the Institute with separate teams of experts, functioning under the supervision of the head of a particular programme.

      • WEBSITE OF THE THREE SEAS PROJECT

      • Europe
        Analyses and commentaries on European integration and the place of Europe on the political and economic map of the world
      • Security
        Studies in the field of international and internal security of individual states, with particular emphasis on the role of NATO
      • Indo-Pacific
        An overview of the political and economic situation in the region, the status of the U.S.-China rivalry, and the EU’s policy towards China
      • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
        Analyses and studies of the Three Seas Initiative, taking into account the perspectives of the participating states
  • People
  • Contact-Careers
  • Polish-Czech Forum
  • Polski
Apr 07
China, European Union, Indo-Pacific, Publications

EU-China Affairs Review March 2025

April 7, 2025

Mikołaj Woźniak, Konrad Falkowski

The end of Chinese limitations on milk export from Germany

In the first half of January 2025, cases of foot-and-mouth disease were detected in domestic cattle in Germany, more precisely in Märkisch-Oderland in Brandenburg. This disease is a highly contagious viral disease that attacks cloven-hoofed animals, such as cattle, sheep, goats and pigs. As a result, many countries trading with Germany decided to suspend the supply of such goods to their territories. One of these countries was also China.

However, as early as March, as reported by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture, “after intensive negotiations, a new version of the veterinary certificate for heat-treated milk and dairy products was agreed with the People’s Republic of China”, which means that Germany can once again trade these goods with the Chinese. Cem Özdemir, the head of the aforementioned ministry, announced: “The rapid agreement with China on the new veterinary certificate is a real breakthrough and will help many companies gradually return to normal operations”. He emphasized the importance of China as a huge sales market for dairy products. As can be read from the announcement published on the ministry’s website, in 2023, Germany exported over 296 000 tons of milk and dairy products to the People’s Republic of China, which accounted for approximately 24.9% of the total export of these products. These calculations did not include the member states of the European Union. Therefore, Özdemir’s words that “with China, we have one of the largest and most important markets for our dairy products” are not surprising.

Wang Yi on China-EU relations

On March 7, Wang Yi, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China expressed his views on relations between China and the European Union during a press conference. The head of Chinese diplomacy emphasized in his opening words that the year 2025 is marked by the round anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the two sides. For 50 years, the EU and China have maintained relations, and in his opinion, this half-century is best described by the following epithets: “The most valuable asset is mutual respect, the most powerful impetus is mutual benefit, the greatest unifying consensus is multilateralism, and the most accurate characterization is cooperation partner”. Later in his speech, he presented the evolution of trade relations, which increased from $2.4 billion to $780 billion. Similarly, the level of investment increased “from almost zero to $260 billion.” He also drew attention to the China-Europe Railway Express initiative, which can currently handle 100,000 loads and “has become a golden passage connecting Asia and Europe.” Moreover, Wang admitted that cooperation between the two powerful economies of modern times is of considerable strategic importance and has a significant impact in the global context. “A healthy and stable relationship will lift up both sides and make for a brighter world,” Wang added.

Slovenian President’s interview for CGTN

On March 7, Chinese television CGTN published a short, 3-minute interview with Slovenian President Nataša Pirc Musar. The host asked her two questions. The first referred to Slovenia’s relations with China, while the second concerned Slovenia’s perception of China’s role in the modern world. Regarding the first question, Musar stated: “Slovenia always had a good relationship with China. Basically, we are trying to cooperate with everybody. Being a small-sized country, you know, it’s a necessity to be open-minded.” She then cited that improving relations between Ljubljana and Beijing have been progressing steadily for several years, as exemplified by Slovenian business delegations sent to China. She noted that she was aware of the existing trade deficit between her country and China, saying that this was an “obvious fact.” Regarding the second question, Musar first stated that “China’s role is a big role.” She emphasized that China is a superpower like the United States, “like some other big countries,” which is why such countries, in her opinion, have “high-level” obligations – here she cited the fact that China is a permanent member of the UN Security Council. So, |we must not discuss peace and security in this planet without China at the table”, she said. Furthermore, she presented her vision of China’s (and not only China’s) role in the world: “China and the rest of the superpowers have to do whatever is necessary no to put us in another catastrophe. I do not want the Third World War.” Later in her speech, she recalled that the world after 1945 is a world in which certain principles have been established, such as respect for the sovereignty and integrity of states and that war is prohibited by international law. Therefore, in her opinion, “fundamental principles cannot be neglected.” The Slovenian president touched on a less obvious topic at the end of her speech, flowing from war to the concept of a common enemy: “When we do discuss enemies on this planet, we only have one common one and that’s the climate crisis.” She stated that China is doing a lot when it comes to green transformation. In this way, she criticized US President Donald Trump’s desire to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. She added at the end that “multilateralism is something that we have to believe in because this is something which could bring prosperity and peace.” In a sense, she expressed her approval of the Chinese narrative regarding multilateralism in the contemporary order. However, the multilateralism, prosperity and peace promoted by the PRC are concepts so broad that differences in interpretation can only appear with deeper analysis, and not with slogans thrown around.

Lithuania is ready to send its envoy to China but there is one condition

Lithuanian Prime Minister Gintautas Paluckas announced on March 10 that his country was ready to send its ambassador or some other kind of diplomatic representative to China only if China did the same to Lithuania. Paluckas called this a “goal” but stressed that “it doesn’t mean we’re going to make any sacrifices.”

The Lithuanian Prime Minister’s words are a kind of commentary on the words of another Lithuanian official. We are talking about Darius Jauniškis, the head of the Lithuanian State Security Department (VSD). A few days earlier, Jauniškis expressed his opinion on attempts to restore Lithuanian-Chinese relations under the rule of the new coalition. Namely, he does not believe that China would ever “forgive Lithuania for recognizing Taiwan and, as they imagine, destroying their unity and the idea of ​​one China.” He further added that “the warming of relations should not take place at the expense of Lithuania.” The VSD head noted that “even an apology from China would not improve relations between Vilnius and Beijing.” It would simply be a humiliation and a great defeat of foreign policy,” Jauniškis implied.

Returning to the Lithuanian Prime Minister’s statement, he referred to the words of the VSD chief and emphasized that Lithuania does not intend to withdraw from anything. Paluckas listed all the “ifs” and “woulds” referring to Lithuania’s humiliation or sacrifice, concluding with the words: “No one is planning to do that.”

Chinese factories in Hungary

In the first half of March, the Chinese optical cable factory ZettaNet was opened in Kisbér, located in northwestern Hungary. The investment was co-financed by the Chinese concern Fiberhome in the amount of around EUR 20 million. During the opening ceremony, which took place on March 11, the Secretary of State in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Levente Magyar, emphasized that Hungary enthusiastically welcomes Chinese investments. He added that Hungarian policy is making every effort to ensure that China sees Hungary as a worthy partner. The Secretary of State for Regional Development, Judit Czunyiné Bertalan, also took the floor after her speech, noting that the Komárom-Esztergom district is the third best developing region in the country. She also emphasised that the ZettaNet factory is located in one of Hungary’s key logistics regions.

The planned investment by the Fiberhome subsidiary was announced in April 2024 during a visit to Beijing by Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade Péter Szijjártó. At that time, it was announced that Hungary would provide 15% financial support for the implementation of this undertaking. Just a few days later, on March 20, the issue of the planned construction of a factory by the Chinese automotive manufacturer BYD in Hungary flared up again. The European Commission’s report shows that the investigation into this matter is at an early stage. The aim of the investigation is to determine whether the construction of the BYD factory was financially supported by the Chinese government. If Brussels manages to confirm these suspicions, BYD may be required to sell part of its assets, reduce production capacity, return subsidies, and may be fined for failure to fulfill its obligations. The Commission’s findings to date show that BYD used Chinese labour to build a factory in Hungary and also plans to import most of the components for the production of electric vehicles, including batteries, directly from China. The Commission emphasises that such actions can only bring symbolic economic growth for Hungary and the entire European Union.

The Hungarian Minister for European Union János Bóka reacted to the Commission’s actions. He stated that Budapest had not been officially informed about the opening of the investigation. However, he added that he was not surprised because, as he noted, any significant investment in the country “very quickly comes under the Commission’s radar,” suggesting that this may be related to Hungary’s geographical proximity to Ukraine. The Minister also assured that Hungary is taking a calm approach to the matter because the government thoroughly verifies all aspects related to foreign investments. The estimated value of the investment is around EUR 4 billion, and the factory is planned to create around 10,000 jobs.

This is not the first investigation into BYD. Last October, the European Commission found that BYD and other Chinese carmakers had benefited from Chinese government subsidies, leading to the imposition of 17 percent tariffs on imports of Chinese vehicles manufactured by the company.

Huawei and the corruption scandal in the EU

In mid-March, a case involving possible illegal practices by Huawei was revealed. The Belgian prosecutor’s office announced that several people had been detained as a result of the investigation. They are accused of bribing the European Parliament on behalf of the Chinese company. According to POLITCO, the case is reminiscent of the Qatargate corruption scandal from 2022, in which several MEPs were also detained.

As reported by the Belgian federal prosecutor’s office on March 13, the initial charges concern corruption, document forgery and money laundering. Investigators suspect that the illegal activities have been ongoing since 2021. Everything was supposed to be done discreetly, under the guise of lobbying activities. The charges included payments to influence political decisions, expensive gifts, paid trips (including to China), invitations to football matches and cash.

During the investigation, 21 locations in Brussels, Flanders, Wallonia and Portugal were searched. According to journalists from the Dutch “Follow The Money” and the Belgian “Le Soir” and “Knack”, the prosecutor’s office is investigating the activities of 15 current and former MEPs. The main suspect is said to be a senior Huawei lobbyist in Brussels. The judge in charge of the case ordered the sealing of two MEP assistants’ offices. The first office belongs to the Italian delegation of the European People’s Party (EPP), associated with long-time MEP Fulvio Martusciello and his colleague Marco Falcone. The second is an office that is part of the Bulgarian delegation to the Renew Europe group. It belonged to Adam Mouchtar, assistant to newly elected MEP Nikola Minchev. Mouchtar was also a co-founder of the EU40 group, chaired by Eva Kaili – a key figure in the Qatargate scandal.

The European Parliament confirmed that it had received an official request for cooperation from the Belgian authorities. Together with the European Commission, it has blacklisted Huawei. This means that the company’s representatives will be immediately suspended from access to the Parliament buildings in Brussels, Strasbourg, Luxembourg and offices in EU countries. The Parliament spokesman stressed that the ban is temporary and will apply until the investigation is completed. Transparency spokesman Olof Gill said that the European Commission and its departments have also been ordered to suspend all contacts with Huawei until further notice.

Huawei responded with a statement saying it takes the allegations seriously and will contact the appropriate authorities. Huawei has a zero-tolerance policy towards corruption or other wrongdoing, and we are committed to complying with all applicable laws and regulations at all times,” the declaration said.

Huawei has been controversial for years. The company is considered a tool of influence for the Chinese government, which – according to many analysts – supports it financially. In addition to its unclear ownership structure, its activity in Europe attracts attention. In the second decade of the 21st century, Huawei invested millions of euros in lobbying and PR activities in the European Union. The company took care of the image of a “friendly partner”: it organized lavish parties, such as the one for Chinese New Year at the Concert Noble in Brussels, handed out smartphones as gifts and maintained close relations with decision-makers. Lobbying expenses are estimated to have been around €3 million between 2018 and 2020, and around €2.5 million between 2021 and 2023. After 2019, when Western countries began to restrict the use of Huawei equipment due to concerns about espionage, the company tried to counteract these activities by hiring former journalists and politicians with access to governments, offering them very high salaries.

In disguise of a “friendly partner,” Huawei has been embroiled in numerous scandals and investigations, including in France, where the company was placed under investigation involving a former minister and a member of the European Parliament. The company’s international operations are also worth noting. Over the past decade, Huawei’s management team has been repeatedly accused of intelligence activities, including in Poland, where allegations of espionage have emerged. The company has also been accused of using “back doors” in IT systems made available to the African Union, which allegedly allowed access to confidential documents and conversations. Huawei has also been accused of circumventing sanctions imposed by the United States.

Despite this, Huawei’s influence in Europe has begun to wane. In 2023, the European Commission announced moves to block Huawei and ZTE from funding research and contracts. The company lost many of its lobbyists and communications officials after that. However, in October 2024, Huawei reported that it still had 11 full-time lobbyists in the EU, nine of whom were accredited to the European Parliament. At its peak, it had 21.

Does Xi Jinping reject the invitation for the upcoming EU-China summit in Brussels?

The Financial Times published an article on March 16 claiming that Chinese President Xi Jinping does not intend to attend the ceremonial, jubilee EU-China summit, which is to be held this year in Brussels. The Financial Times reporters support their reports with statements from people from the “inside”. In this context, Beijing allegedly told EU representatives that the second person in the Chinese state, Premier Li Qiang, would attend the summit in Brussels. According to people familiar with the issue, it is usually the prime minister who comes to the summit in Europe, while in China it is Xi who leads the event. However, the currently planned summit is unique because it will be “celebrating” half a century of EU-China relations, which is why the European side was counting on Xi’s presence.

Reuters also sent its own inquiry about the presence of the Chinese chairman in Brussels. The journalists asked both the Chinese and European sides. The Chinese were not effusive and did not comment on the matter, while the EU, in the words of one official, responded very generally: “Informal discussions are ongoing, both about setting the date for the EU-China summit this year and the level of representation”.

Wang Yi-Emmanuel Bonne telephone conversation

On March 18, the Chinese Foreign Minister held a telephone conversation with Emmanuel Bonn, the French President’s diplomatic advisor, “at the latter’s request,” according to a statement from the Chinese Foreign Ministry. Wang noted that this year marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, and China and France should strengthen their strategic communication. Therefore, China is ready to maintain close high-level contacts with France, deepen strategic cooperation, uphold “true multilateralism”, and protect the position of the United Nations. Furthermore, China is willing to work with France to maintain the current international trade order, safeguard the flow of global industrial and supply chains, oppose “unipolar hegemony” and the placing of individual interests of states above the interests of the international community as a whole, and ultimately “prevent the world from returning to the law of the jungle.” Wang also drew attention to Beijing-Brussels relations during these turbulent times, implying that existing economic and trade frictions should be buried and a negotiated agreement reached. China looks to France to serve as a suitable link on the above issue “to send a positive signal of unity and cooperation and promote the sound and stable development of China-France and China-Europe relations”.

Bonne, for his part, said France highly values ​​the status of bilateral relations. And especially in this complex international situation, he expects high-level strategic exchanges and communication to be maintained. According to the Chinese statement, Bonne said that “France opposes trade wars and tariff wars, and is ready to properly resolve economic and trade frictions through consultations with China, promote balanced and sustainable development of economic and trade relations between France and China and also between Europe and China, and safeguard the international economic and trade system based on the World Trade Organization’s rules.”

An important topic, and probably the one that provoked the entire conversation, was the problem of the war in Ukraine. Bonne presented the situation as France sees it, adding the desire to deepen cooperation with China, and also expressed hope that the People’s Republic of China will “play an important role in reaching a just, stable and sustainable peace agreement.” Wang, in turn, emphasized that China has consistently, since the outbreak of the war, supported “resolving the crisis through dialogue and negotiation”. He added immediately afterwards: “At the same time, this process should respect the will of the parties concerned, should not be imposed by a third party, nor should it only serve the interests of any particular country”. Thus, China stands on the side of a ” a fair, lasting and binding peace agreement” that each of the parties concerned will accept. Finally, Wang announced that Beijing is ready to continue cooperation on this issue with everyone, including Europe. The communiqué also indicates that the interlocutors exchanged views on the Iranian nuclear issue, but this part of the conversation itself was not developed in any way.

Meeting of Wang Wentao and Oliver Zipse

On March 22, a meeting was held in Beijing between the Minister of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, Wang Wentao, and the CEO of the German automotive giant BMW, Oliver Zipse. The topics discussed at the meeting were primarily cooperation between BMW and China, as well as the ongoing EU anti-subsidy investigations and countervailing duties on electric cars of Chinese origin.

Wang made it clear that the protectionist moves by “certain countries” are definitely contributing to “uncertainty to the global economy.” He expressed hope that the European Union, in cooperation with China, will become “a pillar of the multilateral trading system, injecting certainty and stability into the world.” He then pointed out that the Chinese market remains open and the Chinese government itself will support this open business environment. Moreover, China hopes that all disagreements and tensions between Beijing and Brussels will be resolved through dialogue, and that the German automotive giant will “continue to play an active role in promoting the European side to demonstrate political will and work with China to find mutually acceptable solutions.”

For his part, Zipse pointed out the dependence that without cooperation with China, the European green transformation cannot succeed. The company itself shows a certain optimism when it comes to the prospects of cooperation with China, “and is confident in its development in the [Chinese] market.” Saying more, the BMW boss added, it is taking successive steps to increase its investment share in China and is striving to accelerate the localization of production, as well as research and development work. Finally, he announced that in the event of a customs war, there are no winners, only losers, and BMW as a company opposes the imposition of further tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles by the EU. Zipse’s hope is also that the EU and China can “properly resolve their differences.”

President of the Italian Senate in China

Ignazio La Russa, the president of the Italian Senate, went to China on an official diplomatic visit. The main purpose of the visit, according to a statement from the Italian website Agenzia Nova, was to consolidate “the process of rebalancing bilateral relations initiated by the Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni after Italy’s withdrawal from the New Silk Road.”

First, he met with the current chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, Zhao Leji, with whom he discussed the latest developments in Ukraine and the Middle East. He also added that Rome and Beijing are able to play the role of “builders of peace, progress, cohesion and friendship” and together overcome “the difficulties that may exist in international relations to consolidate a time of peace and prosperity.” For his part, Zhao appreciated that Italy respects the principle of “one China”. He further said that China is willing to use the potential of bilateral cooperation in shipbuilding, aviation and new energy, as well as in culture, art, tourism and education. He also referred to relations with the European Union, hoping that in the face of the 50th anniversary of EU-China relations, these relations will be developed, and Italy will “continue to play a positive role in this regard.”

The next day, La Russa met with another Chinese official, this time Vice-President Han Zheng. The subject of the conversation was not much different from the one with Zhao. Han emphasized that China wants to work with China to make “a more mature, stable, open and mutually beneficial relationship with a strategic and long-term perspective.” La Russa, in turn, stated – according to the Chinese note – that by visiting China, he “could fully feel the vitality and achievements of China’s development.” Moreover, he noted that Italy is ready to strengthen “all-round friendly cooperation,” while emphasizing the ancient roots of both Italy and China, which can “make new contributions to world peace and development.”

The Italian Senate President continued his visit to China in Shanghai, where he met with local Chinese Communist Party officials such as Chen Jining and Huang Lixin. After these talks, La Russa said: “It was a very interesting experience to be able to exchange opinions from positions that were apparently distant, but that made us understand how necessary a link between our visions of the world, between our political histories is.” As part of his visit to Shanghai, La Russa also stopped by “Casa Ferrari,” where he met with Giuseppe Cattaneo, the designated head of Ferrari in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan. The Italian Senate President stated that the venue “perfectly embodies the elegance and tradition of the Ferrari brand […] bringing Italian tradition to every corner of the planet.”

Paulo Rangel and Wang Yi

On March 25, Portuguese Foreign Minister Paulo Rangel met with his Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi, in China. The event was dubbed the second China-Portugal strategic dialogue at the foreign ministers’ level. The first topic of the conversation was to emphasize the proper resolution of the Macao issue “with political wisdom, setting a good example of resolving issues left over from history through friendly consultation,” Wang said. Rangel also confirmed this, according to the press release, saying that “both sides have peacefully resolved the Macao issue, setting an example to the world, which Portugal is very proud of.” This was a pretext to raise the issue of relations between China and the European Union. Rangel also confirmed this, according to the Chinese press release, saying that “the two sides have resolved the question of Macao peacefully, setting an example for the world, of which Portugal is highly proud.” This was a pretext to raise the issue of relations between China and the European Union. Wang, referring to the 20th anniversary of the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with Portugal and the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations with the European Union, indicated that China is ready to “work with Portugal to build a more stable, fruitful and dynamic China-Portugal relationship and make China and the EU strategic partners who trust each other and help each other succeed.” Therefore, China opposes unipolarity in the contemporary international system and advocates for an “or an equal and orderly multipolar world and universally beneficial and inclusive economic globalization.” He added that China is willing to strengthen cooperation with Portugal to this end. Furthermore, he emphasized that China regards the European Union as an important pole in the multipolar world and expresses its support for building European strategic autonomy, which will help “expand openness and cooperation, and promote the sound development of China-Europe relations.” Portugal would play a “positive role in this regard.”

Rangel, in addition to confirming the smooth handling of the colonial issue of Macao, also said that bilateral relations between Portugal and China “have maintained sound development.” He further noted that “China is a reliable partner” and that his country “attaches great importance to its relations with China and firmly pursues the one-China policy.” As can be read in the Chinese statement, Rangel invites Chinese companies to Portugal to invest in its territory. Portugal is also willing to strengthen cooperation in the areas of economy, trade, energy, health, as well as finance, infrastructure and green transformation. He also stressed the need to develop educational relations, as more and more Portuguese are learning Chinese. As for the issue of EU-China relations, the Portuguese Foreign Minister said that both sides should continue their partnership and strengthen it through dialogue, cooperation and mutual understanding. Moreover, they should not fall into protectionist policies but should maintain multilateralism and the status of the UN in the modern world.

At the end of the note there was one more, sparingly worded sentence about the war in Ukraine: “The two sides had an exchange of views on the Ukraine crisis and other issues of common interest and concern”.

Maroš Šefčovič in China

Maroš Šefčovič, Vice-President of the European Commission and Commissioner for Trade and Economic Security, met with Vice Premier of the People’s Republic of China He Lifeng in Beijing on 27 March. As could be learned from the announcement of his trip, Šefčovič expressed his intentions regarding his visit to the Middle Kingdom. He admitted that China remains an important partner for the European Union, and his intentions were:

  • proactively engaging in areas of divergence between Brussels and Beijing;
  • identifying EU concerns related to equal opportunities and impact on the Union, which cannot be left unaddressed;
  • developing solutions to specific market access issues;
  • discussing how Chinese foreign direct investment in the EU can provide active support for the development of European Union value chains and technologies.

Peggy Corlin from Euronews attempted to interpret the intentions of the EU Commissioner. In this way, she stated in five points that the European Union:

  • sends a signal to Washington that it is able to reach an understanding with China while the US is antagonizing its allies;
  • plans to re-establish diplomatic dialogue, which would mainly concern the issue of Chinese electric vehicles and risk reduction policy more broadly;
  • attempts to persuade China to take action on its overcapacity, which poses a threat to the European market;
  • wants to remove barriers for European companies whose operations in China are hampered by domestic regulations;
  • seeks to attract more Chinese investments, but with the reservation that this should be done on EU principles.

According to the European report, during the conversation with Chinese officials, Šefčovič discussed issues related to plans to improve and balance trade and investment relations between the EU and China, including the need to level the playing field for European companies on the Chinese market. He raised the related issue of access to the PRC market. As well as the issue of investment in the electric vehicle supply chain.

If we talk about the discussion with He Lifeng the EU note does not serve too much information. More about it can be learned from the announcement of the second side. He told his European interlocutor that “China is willing to work with the EU to strengthen dialogue and exchange, handle economic and trade differences in the proper manner, expand mutual openness, and promote the healthy, stable development of China-EU economic and trade relations.” He also pointed out that 2025 is an anniversary year in the history of Sino-European relations, which is why the Vice Premier of the PRC announced that Beijing is ready to cooperate with the European Union to implement ” the important consensus reached by the leaders of the two sides.” Moreover, China hopes that together with the EU, they will stand against “unilateralism and protectionism” and jointly protect the multilateral trading system.

As for Šefčovič’s statements, he stressed that China is “an important partner for the EU”. The 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the EU and China – in his opinion – is also a good opportunity “to deepen economic and trade cooperation.” Moreover, he added that both sides should resolve their disputes and disagreements through “dialogue and consultations.”

In the case of the conversation with Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, both sides agreed to monitor their discussions “through regular contact to provide political steer and ensure adequate progress on all discussed files, including the key market access issues raised by the EU.” Moreover, they confirmed their willingness to engage in dialogue on “all trade and investment issues” related to the supply of Chinese electric vehicles, in order to “provide greater contribution to long-term European competitiveness and quality jobs.”

As for the customs secretary, Šefčovič reached an agreement with her in the context of establishing a working group on access to the agri-food market and carrying out an analysis on the revision of the 2024 EU-China Customs Cooperation and Mutual Assistance Agreement.

Jean-Noel Barrot in China

Also on March 27, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot arrived in China from the Old Continent, where he met in Beijing with his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi and Chinese Premier Li Qiang. The planned visit had already been announced earlier in March, when the head of the French cognac lobbying group (BNIC) said that Barrot was to go on a trip to Asia, including China.

During the meeting with Wang, the issues of the war in Ukraine and the disputes between Brussels and Beijing were raised. According to Barrot, “China also has a role to play in convincing Russia to come to the negotiating table with serious and good-faith proposals,” which is not far from the narrative generally accepted in Europe about China’s importance in the development of this conflict. In addition, according to the Chinese statement, he stated that for both France and China it is not without significance to “strengthen strategic coordination, play their roles as major countries, and safeguard world peace and stability.” Referring to the Ukrainian issue, Barrot said that Europe “as an independent pole in the world” is ready to conduct a constructive dialogue with the Chinese in the name of strategic autonomy, as well as to cultivate the multipolarity of the modern order and protect peace. He also admitted that the European Union should resolve its disputes with China through consultations. And here we must move on to a more “private” issue for France, which is the Chinese tariffs on cognac. In defense of the French alcohol industry, Barrot announced that “our common objective is to obtain a rapid response on this issue.”

At the time of the conversation, Wang was supposed to reassure his interlocutor on this matter, but no formal steps have been taken so far. For his part, the Chinese Foreign Minister appealed for the need for cooperation between China and France, or saying more precisely: “Amid the changing and turbulent international landscape, the two sides should demonstrate the responsibility of major countries, oppose unilateralism with multilateralism.” He also further raised the issue of opposition to returning to the “law of the jungle.” As for economic matters, Wang assured Barrot that China wants to deepen cooperation in sectors considered traditional, but also open up new fields of opportunity in other areas, “to inject new momentum into China-France cooperation.”

In the case of the conversation between the head of French diplomacy and the Chinese premier, the topics were very similar. Li noted that “the world is currently not peaceful, and instability and uncertainty are increasing.” Hence, the obligation for both countries to strengthen communication and coordination, which would “inject more stability and certainty into the common development” not only of China and France, but also of the whole world. To which Barrot agreed, saying that we are indeed witnessing how the world is “going through troubled times where a number of major principles, particularly those of multilateralism, are being shaken.” Li also expressed hope that in the context of China’s relations with the European Union, France will play “a positive role” in trying to reach an agreement within the framework of the prevailing disputes. Finally, Barrot once again emphasized Europe’s pursuit of strategic independence. He announced that “a new Europe is rapidly emerging, its only compass being strategic autonomy.” The “new Europe” he mentioned is also to invest significantly “in its defense” and “in energy.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-Mail
Konrad Falkowski

Related Posts

See All Publications
  • China, European Union, Indo-Pacific, Publications

EU-China Affairs Review January 2026

Mikołaj Woźniak, Karolina Czarnowska 1.01. China warns EU against restrictions on carbon emissions trading The Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM)…
  • Mikołaj Woźniak
  • February 16, 2026
  • Europe, Publications, Russia

Russia Affairs Review January 2026

Ksawery Stawiński, Kateryna Vasylyk 6.01 – Major Demographic Crisis in RussiaDuring the annual international conference “Foundry Council” in Chelyabinsk, renowned…
  • Ksawery Stawiński
  • February 16, 2026
  • Africa and Middle East, Analysis, Publications

Overview of Events in the Middle East – December 2025

Israel–Lebanon Relations: Status as of December 2025 Beirut, December 1–31 Since October 2024, a ceasefire has been in effect between…
  • Kasjusz Matyjasek
  • January 31, 2026
See All Publications

Comments are closed.

Konrad Falkowski
Program Europa tworzą:

Marcin Chruściel

Dyrektor programu. Absolwent studiów doktoranckich z zakresu nauk o polityce na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim, magister stosunków międzynarodowych i europeistyki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prezes Zarządu Instytutu Nowej Europy.

dr Artur Bartoszewicz

Przewodniczący Rady Programowej Instytutu Nowej Europy. Doktor nauk ekonomicznych Szkoły Głównej Handlowej. Ekspert w dziedzinie polityki publicznej, w tym m. in. strategii państwa i gospodarki.

Michał Banasiak

Specjalizuje się w relacjach sportu i polityki. Autor analiz, komentarzy i wywiadów z zakresu dyplomacji sportowej i polityki międzynarodowej. Były dziennikarz Polsat News i wysłannik redakcji zagranicznej Telewizji Polskiej.

Maciej Pawłowski

Ekspert ds. migracji, gospodarki i polityki państw basenu Morza Śródziemnego. W latach 2018-2020 Analityk PISM ds. Południowej Europy. Autor publikacji w polskiej i zagranicznej prasie na temat Hiszpanii, Włoch, Grecji, Egiptu i państw Magrebu. Od września 2020 r. mieszka w północnej Afryce (Egipt, Algieria).

Jędrzej Błaszczak

Absolwent studiów prawniczych Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Katowicach. Jego zainteresowania badawcze koncentrują się na Inicjatywie Trójmorza i polityce w Bułgarii. Doświadczenie zdobywał w European Foundation of Human Rights w Wilnie, Center for the Study of Democracy w Sofii i polskich placówkach dyplomatycznych w Teheranie i Tbilisi.

Program Bezpieczeństwo tworzą:

dr Aleksander Olech

Dyrektor programu. Wykładowca na Baltic Defence College, absolwent Europejskiej Akademii Dyplomacji oraz Akademii Sztuki Wojennej. Jego główne zainteresowania badawcze to terroryzm, bezpieczeństwo w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej oraz rola NATO i UE w środowisku zagrożeń hybrydowych.

dr Agnieszka Rogozińska

Członek Rady Programowej Instytutu Nowej Europy. Doktor nauk społecznych w dyscyplinie nauki o polityce. Zainteresowania badawcze koncentruje na problematyce bezpieczeństwa euroatlantyckiego, instytucjonalnym wymiarze bezpieczeństwa i współczesnych zagrożeniach.

Aleksy Borówka

Doktorant na Wydziale Nauk Społecznych Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Przewodniczący Krajowej Reprezentacji Doktorantów w kadencji 2020. Autor kilkunastu prac naukowych, poświęconych naukom o bezpieczeństwie, naukom o polityce i administracji oraz stosunkom międzynarodowym. Laureat I, II oraz III Międzynarodowej Olimpiady Geopolitycznej.

Karolina Siekierka

Absolwentka Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego na kierunku stosunki międzynarodowe, specjalizacji Bezpieczeństwo i Studia Strategiczne. Jej zainteresowania badawcze obejmują politykę zagraniczną i wewnętrzną Francji, prawa człowieka oraz konflikty zbrojne.

Stanisław Waszczykowski

Podoficer rezerwy, student studiów magisterskich na kierunku Bezpieczeństwo Międzynarodowe i Dyplomacja na Akademii Sztuki Wojennej, były praktykant w BBN. Jego zainteresowania badawcze obejmują m.in. operacje pokojowe ONZ oraz bezpieczeństwo Ukrainy.

Leon Pińczak

Student studiów drugiego stopnia na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim na kierunku stosunki międzynarodowe. Dziennikarz polskojęzycznej redakcji Biełsatu. Zawodowo zajmuje się obszarem postsowieckim, rosyjską polityką wewnętrzną i doktrynami FR. Biegle włada językiem rosyjskim.

Program Indo-Pacyfik tworzą:

Łukasz Kobierski

Dyrektor programu. Współzałożyciel INE oraz prezes zarządu w latach 2019-2021. Stypendysta szkoleń z zakresu bezpieczeństwa na Daniel Morgan Graduate School of National Security w Waszyngtonie, ekspert od stosunków międzynarodowych. Absolwent Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego oraz Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. Wiceprezes Zarządu INE.

dr Joanna Siekiera

Prawnik międzynarodowy, doktor nauk społecznych, adiunkt na Wydziale Prawa Uniwersytetu w Bergen w Norwegii. Była stypendystką rządu Nowej Zelandii na Uniwersytecie Victorii w Wellington, niemieckiego Institute of Cultural Diplomacy, a także francuskiego Institut de relations internationales et stratégiques.

Paweł Paszak

Absolwent stosunków międzynarodowych (spec. Wschodnioazjatycka) na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim oraz stypendysta University of Kent (W. Brytania) i Hainan University (ChRL). Doktorant UW i Akademii Sztuki Wojennej. Jego zainteresowania badawcze obejmują politykę zagraniczną ChRL oraz strategiczną rywalizację Chiny-USA.

Jakub Graca

Magister stosunków międzynarodowych na Uniwersytecie Jagiellońskim; studiował także filologię orientalną (specjalność: arabistyka). Analityk Centrum Inicjatyw Międzynarodowych (Warszawa) oraz Instytutu Nowej Europy. Zainteresowania badawcze: Stany Zjednoczone (z naciskiem na politykę zagraniczną), relacje transatlantyckie.

Patryk Szczotka

Absolwent filologii dalekowschodniej ze specjalnością chińską na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim oraz student kierunku double degree China and International Relations na Aalborg University oraz University of International Relations (国际关系学院) w Pekinie. Jego zainteresowania naukowe to relacje polityczne i gospodarcze UE-ChRL oraz dyplomacja.

The programme's team:

Marcin Chruściel

Programme director. Graduate of PhD studies in Political Science at the University of Wroclaw and Master studies in International Relations at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. President of the Management Board at the Institute of New Europe.

PhD Artur Bartoszewicz

Chairman of the Institute's Programme Board. Doctor of Economic Sciences at the SGH Warsaw School of Economics. Expert in the field of public policy, including state and economic strategies. Expert at the National Centre for Research and Development and the Digital Poland Projects Centre.

Michał Banasiak

He specializes in relationship of sports and politics. Author of analysis, comments and interviews in the field of sports diplomacy and international politics. Former Polsat News and Polish Television’s foreign desk journalist.

Maciej Pawłowski

Expert on migration, economics and politics of Mediterranean countries. In the period of 2018-2020 PISM Analyst on Southern Europe. Author of various articles in Polish and foreign press about Spain, Italy, Greece, Egypt and Maghreb countries. Since September 2020 lives in North Africa (Egypt, Algeria).

Jędrzej Błaszczak

Graduate of Law at the University of Silesia. His research interests focus on the Three Seas Initiative and politics in Bulgaria. He acquired experience at the European Foundation of Human Rights in Vilnius, the Center for the Study of Democracy in Sofia, and in Polish embassies in Tehran and Tbilisi.

PhD Aleksander Olech

Programme director. Visiting lecturer at the Baltic Defence College, graduate of the European Academy of Diplomacy and War Studies University. His main research interests include terrorism, international cooperation for security in Eastern Europe and the role of NATO and the EU with regard to hybrid threats.

PhD Agnieszka Rogozińska

Member of the Institute's Programme Board. Doctor of Social Sciences in the discipline of Political Science. Editorial secretary of the academic journals "Politics & Security" and "Independence: journal devoted to Poland's recent history". Her research interests focus on security issues.

Aleksy Borówka

PhD candidate at the Faculty of Social Sciences in the University of Wroclaw, the President of the Polish National Associations of PhD Candidates in 2020. The author of dozen of scientific papers, concerning security studies, political science, administration, international relations. Laureate of the I, II and III International Geopolitical Olympiad.

Karolina Siekierka

Graduate of International Relations specializing in Security and Strategic Studies at University of Warsaw. Erasmus student at the Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1) and the Institut d’Etudes Politique de Paris (Sciences Po Paris). Her research areas include human rights, climate change and armed conflicts.

Stanisław Waszczykowski

Reserve non-commissioned officer. Master's degree student in International Security and Diplomacy at the War Studies University in Warsaw, former trainee at the National Security Bureau. His research interests include issues related to UN peacekeeping operations and the security of Ukraine.

Leon Pińczak

A second-degree student at the University of Warsaw, majoring in international relations. A journalist of the Polish language edition of Belsat. Interested in the post-Soviet area, with a particular focus on Russian internal politics and Russian doctrines - foreign, defense and information-cybernetic.

Łukasz Kobierski

Programme director. Deputy President of the Management Board. Scholarship holder at the Daniel Morgan Graduate School of National Security in Washington and an expert in the field of international relations. Graduate of the University of Warsaw and the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

PhD Joanna Siekiera

International lawyer, Doctor of social sciences, postdoctor at the Faculty of Law, University of Bergen, Norway. She was a scholarship holder of the New Zealand government at the Victoria University of Wellington, Institute of Cultural Diplomacy in Germany, Institut de relations internationales et stratégiques in France.

Paweł Paszak

Graduate of International Relations (specialisation in East Asian Studies) from the University of Warsaw and scholarship holder at the University of Kent (UK) and Hainan University (China). PhD candidate at the University of Warsaw and the War Studies University. His research areas include the foreign policy of China and the strategic rivalry between China and the US in the Indo-Pacific.

Jakub Graca

Master of International Relations at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. He also studied Arabic therein. An analyst at the Center for International Initiatives (Warsaw) and the Institute of New Europe. Research interests: United States (mainly foreign policy), transatlantic relations.

Patryk Szczotka

A graduate of Far Eastern Philology with a specialization in China Studies at the University of Wroclaw and a student of a double degree “China and International Relations” at Aalborg University and University of International Relations (国际关系学院) in Beijing. His research interests include EU-China political and economic relations, as well as diplomacy.

Three Seas Think Tanks Hub is a platform of cooperation among different think tanks based in 3SI member countries. Their common goal is to strengthen public debate and understanding of the Three Seas region seen from the political, economic and security perspective. The project aims at exchanging ideas, research and publications on the region’s potential and challenges.

Members

The Baltic Security Foundation (Latvia)

The BSF promotes the security and defense of the Baltic Sea region. It gathers security experts from the region and beyond, provides a platform for discussion and research, promotes solutions that lead to stronger regional security in the military and other areas.

The Institute for Politics and Society (Czech Republic)

The Institute analyses important economic, political, and social areas that affect today’s society. The mission of the Institute is to cultivate the Czech political and public sphere through professional and open discussion.

Nézöpont Institute (Hungary)

The Institute aims at improving Hungarian public life and public discourse by providing real data, facts and opinions based on those. Its primary focus points are Hungarian youth, media policy and Central European cooperation.

The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (Austria)

The wiiw is one of the principal centres for research on Central, East and Southeast Europe with 50 years of experience. Over the years, the Institute has broadened its expertise, increasing its regional coverage – to European integration, the countries of Wider Europe and selected issues of the global economy.

The International Institute for Peace (Austria)

The Institute strives to address the most topical issues of the day and promote dialogue, public engagement, and a common understanding to ensure a holistic approach to conflict resolution and a durable peace. The IIP functions as a platform to promote peace and non-violent conflict resolution across the world.

The Institute for Regional and International Studies (Bulgaria)

The IRIS initiates, develops and implements civic strategies for democratic politics at the national, regional and international level. The Institute promotes the values of democracy, civil society, freedom and respect for law and assists the process of deepening Bulgarian integration in NATO and the EU.

The European Institute of Romania

EIR is a public institution whose mission is to provide expertise in the field of European Affairs to the public administration, the business community, the social partners and the civil society. EIR’s activity is focused on four key domains: research, training, communication, translation of the EHRC case-law.

The Institute of New Europe (Poland)

The Institute is an advisory and analytical non-governmental organisation active in the fields of international politics, international security and economics. The Institute supports policy-makers by providing them with expert opinions, as well as creating a platform for academics, publicists, and commentators to exchange ideas.

YouTube

Latest publications

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • EU-China Affairs Review January 2026
    by Mikołaj Woźniak
    February 16, 2026
  • Russia Affairs Review January 2026
    by Ksawery Stawiński
    February 16, 2026
  • Overview of Events in the Middle East – December 2025
    by Kasjusz Matyjasek
    January 31, 2026

Categories

THE MOST POPULAR TAGS:

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

China European Union International politics International security Map Middle East Poland Russia Security Ukraine USA

  • About
  • Publications
  • Europe
  • Security
  • O nas
  • Publikacje
  • Europa
  • Bezpieczeństwo
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
  • People
  • Contact – Careers
  • Indo-Pacyfik
  • Trójmorze
  • Ludzie
  • Kontakt – Kariera

Financed with funds from the National Freedom Institute - Center for Civil Society Development under the Governmental Civil Society Organisations Development Programme for 2018-2030.

Sfinansowano ze środków Narodowego Instytutu Wolności – Centrum Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Obywatelskiego w ramach Rządowego Programu Rozwoju Organizacji Obywatelskich na lata 2018-2030.



© 2019-2024 The Institute of New Europe Foundation · All rights reserved · Support us