Email · kontakt@ine.org.pl
Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe
  • About
  • Publications
      • Publications

        The primary categories of materials published by the Institute as part of its research and analytical activities.

      • SEE ALL PUBLICATIONS

      • Analyses
        Daily commentary and analysis on international issues provided by our experts and analysts
      • Reports
        Comprehensive thematic studies on international relations and socio-political issues
      • Video
        Recordings of expert debates and series of video podcasts created by our team and experts
      • Maps
        Selection of maps depicting international alliances and foreign visits of key politicians
  • Programmes
      • Programmes

        The main areas of research and publication activities at the Institute with separate teams of experts, functioning under the supervision of the head of a particular programme.

      • WEBSITE OF THE THREE SEAS PROJECT

      • Europe
        Analyses and commentaries on European integration and the place of Europe on the political and economic map of the world
      • Security
        Studies in the field of international and internal security of individual states, with particular emphasis on the role of NATO
      • Indo-Pacific
        An overview of the political and economic situation in the region, the status of the U.S.-China rivalry, and the EU’s policy towards China
      • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
        Analyses and studies of the Three Seas Initiative, taking into account the perspectives of the participating states
  • People
  • Contact-Careers
  • Polish-Czech Forum
  • Polski
Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe
  • About
  • Publications
      • Publications

        The primary categories of materials published by the Institute as part of its research and analytical activities.

      • SEE ALL PUBLICATIONS

      • Analyses
        Daily commentary and analysis on international issues provided by our experts and analysts
      • Reports
        Comprehensive thematic studies on international relations and socio-political issues
      • Video
        Recordings of expert debates and series of video podcasts created by our team and experts
      • Maps
        Selection of maps depicting international alliances and foreign visits of key politicians
  • Programmes
      • Programmes

        The main areas of research and publication activities at the Institute with separate teams of experts, functioning under the supervision of the head of a particular programme.

      • WEBSITE OF THE THREE SEAS PROJECT

      • Europe
        Analyses and commentaries on European integration and the place of Europe on the political and economic map of the world
      • Security
        Studies in the field of international and internal security of individual states, with particular emphasis on the role of NATO
      • Indo-Pacific
        An overview of the political and economic situation in the region, the status of the U.S.-China rivalry, and the EU’s policy towards China
      • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
        Analyses and studies of the Three Seas Initiative, taking into account the perspectives of the participating states
  • People
  • Contact-Careers
  • Polish-Czech Forum
  • Polski
Jun 15
China, European Union, Indo-Pacific, Publications

EU-China Affairs Review May 2025

June 15, 2025

Mikołaj Woźniak, Konrad Falkowski

9.05. Slovakian-Chinese talks in Moscow

Against the background of the celebrations of Russia’s Victory Day on May 9, a meeting of representatives of Slovakia and China took place. The parties were represented by Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. This was their second personal meeting in the last six months. Also present were the Secretary of the Communist Party of China Cai Qi and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi.

The talks mainly concerned issues related to the agreement on the “comprehensive strategic partnership”, which was a kind of continuation of the topic initiated at the end of 2024. At that time, Slovakia and the People’s Republic of China signed agreements raising the profile of bilateral relations. These agreements covered four main areas:

  1. strengthening political trust;
  2. enhancing cooperation in the sectors of renewable energy, transport and logistics, infrastructure and water resources management;
  3. developing people-to-people exchanges;
  4. coordination in international politics.

Prime Minister Fico stressed that the further implementation of these provisions in the field of cultural, economic and visa cooperation is crucial. One of the main topics was Chinese investments in Slovakia. Fico and Xi discussed two strategic projects. The first concerned the investment of the Swedish company Volvo Cars – owned since 2010 by the Chinese concern Geely – in a production plant in Valaliky (near Košice). The second project involves the construction of a battery factory by the company Gotion near Šurany. The Slovak Prime Minister expressed satisfaction with the fact that both projects are being implemented according to plan and enjoy strong support from both Slovakia and China.

During the meeting, the Slovak side expressed interest in establishing the Slovak Institute in Beijing – a soft power institution responsible for promoting Slovak culture, language and art abroad. At the same time, the Chinese side was offered the possibility of expanding the activities of the Confucius Institute in Bratislava, which currently operates as an affiliated unit of Bratislava universities. In addition to socio-cultural issues, the Slovak Prime Minister informed about the government’s actions to simplify the process of issuing work visas to the Schengen area. The lifted restrictions are to primarily concern Chinese entrepreneurs. In connection with this, Fico approached the Chinese side with a proposal to extend the currently applicable visa-free entry of Slovak citizens to China. Currently, Slovaks can stay in China without a visa for a period of 30 days. The visa policy introduced by China on November 8, 2024, covers 38 countries and – according to the announcements of the Chinese authorities – is to be valid until December 31, 2025.

Geopolitical issues were also discussed. The talks turned to the trade conflict that is heating up between China, the US and the EU. In this context, Fico expressed his appreciation for the Chinese leader’s openness to the exchange of views and confirmed that Slovakia is interested in developing balanced and predictable relations with China. The meeting ended with an invitation for the Chinese leader to pay an official visit to Slovakia. Prime Minister Fico emphasised that this would be a significant step towards deepening bilateral relations and the practical implementation of the strategic partnership.

14.05. Merz on China during his first speech in front of the Bundestag

On May 14, the new German Chancellor, Friedrich Merz, spoke for the first time in this role before the German Bundestag. In his speech, he addressed all the key issues for German politics and economy. He also referred to the issue of relations with China.

At the beginning, Merz noted that the relations between Berlin and Beijing are “shaped by systemic rivalry and power politics,” which can be interpreted as a shift away from the leniency towards China in German foreign policy and towards a more rigorous approach to joint relations. “We observe that in China’s foreign policy actions the elements of systemic rivalry are on the rise,” Merz stated. This evolution of attitude did not come out of nowhere, because the main determinant in this respect is the close cooperation between China and Russia, especially in the context of the war in Ukraine. The new German Chancellor described this cooperation as “great concern.” As a result, it will lead to Germany “will push determinedly for China to make its contribution toward ending the war in Ukraine.” Furthermore, Merz announced that Germany’s policy towards China will also be motivated by a “regional approach.” At this point, he stated that “a stable, free and secure Indo-Pacific is for Germany and the EU of great strategic importance.”

However, this does not change the fact, which the German Chancellor also emphasized, that the Chinese “remaina the important partner of Germany and the European Union” in the context of global challenges – and there is no lack of them. And here Merz made a nod to the concept of “de-risking”, which is currently in crisis within the EU. He announced that Germany will continue to “reduce one-side dependencies” – here we are talking primarily about key economic sectors, such as the automotive industry. He also added that in the face of ongoing changes in the international order, “we have learned that we need to diversify our supply chains and [at this point he emphasized again] reduce one-side dependencies.”

In contrast, it is worth mentioning that the Chinese side has commented on Merz’s above claims. Jiang Feng, professor of European Studies at the Shanghai International Studies University, spoke in the Global Times. He accused the German Chancellor of contradicting the assumptions he made: “On the one hand, the German government is eager to revive its economy and cannot afford to bypass China, a major global economic power. On the other hand, over-emphasizing strategic risks in the bilateral relationship may lead German businesses to adopt a more cautious approach toward investing and trading with China.” As a result, according to the Chinese scholar, “what s intended to strengthen ties may instead sow distrust and hesitation, undermining the very cooperation both sides seek.”

15.05. He Lifeng in China

On May 15, Vice Premier He Lifeng visited the French capital to attend the 10th China-France High-Level Economic and Financial Dialogue. He met with French Minister of Economy Eric Lombard. In his statement, He assured that “China is willing to work with France to strengthen coordination on multilateral international affairs, and safeguard an open and cooperative international economic and trade environment.” Furthermore, he said that China is ready to work with France to implement the consensuses reached and strengthen coordination in resolving global challenges, as well as create favorable conditions for the development of a friendly trade and investment environment for both China in France and France in China. He said this would “inject new vitality into the China-France comprehensive strategic partnership while leading China-Europe cooperation to achieve new development.”

Lombard, on the other hand, confirmed to his interlocutor that France attaches great importance to relations with China and wants to work with them in the name of solving the challenges facing the modern world, such as climate change, and support them in strengthening multilateralism and free trade. Moreover, according to the French minister, France will continue to supply the Chinese market with high-quality products and ensure that the business environment is increasingly accessible to Chinese companies.

17.05. Rasmussen in China

Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen travelled to China between 17 and 19 May. The visit was connected with the celebration of the 75th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the two countries. During the visit, Rasmussen met with, among others, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, Minister of Commerce Wang Wentao, Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party in Tianjin Chen Miner and Mayor of Tianjin Zhang Gong. He also visited the Danish company Danfoss’ factory in China.

During the foreign ministers’ meeting, Wang Yi stressed that China fully respects Denmark’s sovereignty and territorial integrity in the context of Greenland. This was a reference to controversial statements by US President Donald Trump, who suggested that the United States should take control of the autonomous, resource-rich territory. Wang also expressed hope that Denmark “will continue to support China’s legitimate position on matters concerning its sovereignty and territorial integrity.” Later in the talks, Wang noted that China is ready to deepen economic cooperation with Denmark, especially in the field of green technology and scientific innovation.

Rasmussen also met with Chinese Trade Minister Wang Wentao. The talks focused on trade relations between Denmark and China, as well as EU-China economic relations. Both sides addressed the issue of protecting the multilateral trading system. Representatives from the Confederation of Danish Industry and Danish companies such as Novo Nordisk and Carlsberg also participated in the meetings.

Rasmussen’s visit comes just days after Beijing criticized Denmark for hosting former Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen. Tsai met with Danish lawmakers on May 15 and gave a speech at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit, accusing China of ramping up cyberattacks and military exercises against Taiwan.

Relations between China and Denmark have been tensed for some time. The main reason is Copenhagen’s informal contacts with Taipei. Tensions peaked in 2009, when the Dalai Lama visited Denmark. Since then, relations have improved, including through so-called “panda diplomacy,” in which Beijing donated two pandas to the Copenhagen Zoo.

19.05. Sikorski-Wang telephone conversation

On May 19, Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski held a telephone conversation with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi. Both Polish and Chinese ministries reported on the event. The scope of topics discussed in the conversation raises some doubts, which results from the discrepancies in the messages from both sides.

The Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs informed about the conversation in the Polish sphere. It published a short note on the X platform with the information that the topics of the talks were the issues of ending the war in Ukraine, the role of the UN Charter and the security of transport routes between the EU and China. It was also emphasized that Minister Sikorski had renewed the invitation for Wang to visit Poland. Some observers were surprised by the fact that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not publish any official statement on its website – which is standard practice for talks at such a high level.

In turn, the Chinese diplomatic ministry published a more extensive communiqué, which emphasized that Poland is “an important strategic partner of China in Europe.” The Chinese side expressed the expectation that Poland – as the country holding the rotating presidency of the EU Council – will play a more constructive role in promoting greater progress in China-EU relations. Wang also expressed the expectation that Poland will adhere to the international consensus on the One China policy and oppose any actions in favor of “Taiwan independence.” However, the Chinese statement did not mention Wang’s invitation to Poland, which may suggest a lack of mutual confirmation of this intention.

19.05. Wadephul-Wang telephone conversation

On May 19, a telephone conversation took place between the foreign ministers of Germany and China. According to a note from the Chinese Foreign Ministry, Wang Yi congratulated his counterpart on taking office and then announced that “China-Germany relations carry significance beyond the bilateral scope and exert an important influence on global economic development and strategic stability.” In doing so, he expressed hope that the new government in Germany would maintain strategic cooperation between Beijing and Berlin and “pursue a rational and pragmatic policy towards China.” He also implied that the EU’s de-risking policy was undermining the foundations of “normal bilateral cooperation.” Moreover, in the perspective of 50 years of EU-PRC diplomatic relations, Wang believes that Germany should continue to play an active role as an important link between the EU and China, and also bring “fresh momentum” into these relations. The issue of resolving the electric vehicle dispute with the People’s Republic of China is still on China’s agenda, so Wang raised the issue, saying: “China expects that the EU to work with China in the same direction, properly resolve the anti-subsidy case involving Chinese-made electric vehicles at an early date, and promote the upgrading of China-EU cooperation.”

For his part, the new German Foreign Minister Johann David Wadephul – according to a Chinese statement – ​​stated that relations between Germany and China are “of great significance to the world’s economic development and the future of the international community”, and described the policy of the new government towards China as “proactive”. He stressed that Germany remains committed to the principle of “one China”, which is always of great importance to Beijing. He also noted that due to the position Germany plays in the European Union, it has a duty to get involved in resolving burning issues and misunderstandings between the Union and China, including the issue of Chinese electric cars.

The issue of the war in Ukraine was also raised – here constantly described as the “crisis in Ukraine.” Wang stated that China is promoting the initiation of peace talks that will lead to the achievement of a “fair, lasting and binding peace agreement”. Wadephul, in turn, stated that Germany (as well as the whole of Europe) is counting on “China will exert its influence to achieve a ceasefire”. The Chinese note did not specify exactly what this influence would consist of or who it would affect. Knowing the European narrative, this influence would concern Russia, so that it would leave the territory of Ukraine and cease all violence. However, this was not presented in detail by the Chinese side.

20.05. EU hits the Chinese companies for supporting Russia

The European Union is increasingly focusing on China’s role in bypassing sanctions against Russia. In the new, 17th package of sanctions, adopted on May 20, Brussels introduced further restrictions on Chinese companies that support the Russian arms industry and oil trade. This is part of a broader strategy to pressure third countries that help Moscow despite prohibitions.

The new sanctions cover three Chinese companies that, according to the EU, supply parts for drone production to Russia. This is not the first such move. In December 2024, as part of the 15th package of sanctions, the EU imposed restrictions on seven Chinese entities. Brussels has announced that it will continue this course. The package also includes sanctions against the so-called “shadow fleet” – a network of tankers that transport Russian oil in violation of the embargo. The EU has banned almost 200 such ships, bringing the total number of blocked units to 342. In addition, restrictions have been imposed on shipping companies from third countries, such as the United Arab Emirates, Turkey and Hong Kong, which help organize this procedure. Hard data was recently provided by the German media. Based on a report by the German Foreign Office, revealed by the Süddeutsche Zeitung, NDR and WDR reported that as much as 80% of cases of bypassing sanctions are carried out via China and Hong Kong. This information was confirmed in Brussels by the EU’s sanctions coordinator, David O’Sullivan. The report also shows that companies from the EU itself are involved in the procedure, which complicates the European Commission’s talks with third countries.

The new sanctions package was agreed and introduced together with Great Britain, but – importantly – without the participation of the United States. The reason is the unsuccessful negotiations on this matter. O’Sullivan admitted that there is no longer a permanent channel of cooperation between the EU and the US in the field of sanctions policy. He added that cooperation with the G7 countries on restrictions has “lost its momentum”. According to EU officials, Brussels no longer counts on active support from Washington in the fight against Russia’s evasion of sanctions.

Ukraine also weighed in. Ukrainian Foreign Intelligence Service Chief Oleh Ivashchenko said on May 26 that China continues to supply Russia with materials needed for weapons production, including machine tools, chemicals, gunpowder, and parts for weapons systems. According to the Ukrainian side, such supplies go to at least 20 Russian factories.

In response to the European Union’s 17th package of sanctions, which also targeted Chinese companies, Beijing expressed strong opposition. On May 21, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said that China “firmly oppose those unjustified European sanctions against Chinese companies” and called on the EU to abandon “double standards” in trade relations with Russia. Mao argued that many countries – both in Europe and the United States – still maintain economic contacts with Moscow, which is why sanctions against Chinese companies are, in her opinion, selective and politically motivated. The spokeswoman added that PRC “will do what is necessary to firmly defend its lawful rights and interests.”

22.05. Macron-Xi telephone conversation

On May 22, a telephone conversation took place between Chinese President Xi Jinping and French President Emmanuel Macron – as the Chinese side noted: “at the latter’s request”. Macron, in turn, noted in his post on the X platform that the conversation took place “on the eve of my trip to Southeast Asia” and discussed bilateral trade relations and international affairs. President Xi emphasized that both sides should strive to strengthen and expand cooperation in various fields, such as investment, aviation, space, nuclear energy, the digital sector, green development and biopharmaceuticals. He added that China and France, as two permanent members of the UN Security Council, have the responsibility to strengthen solidarity and cooperation and uphold the authority and position of the United Nations itself and the multilateral order it guards. The Chinese leader also drew attention to the European Union, saying that for China, Europe is always “an independent pole in a multipolar world”, and that Beijing supports the EU’s pursuit of strategic autonomy. The PRC Foreign Ministry’s statement also briefly mentions that the interlocutors exchanged views on the “crisis in Ukraine,” the conflict in Palestine, and Iran’s nuclear program.

Having already mentioned the French president’s post, he noted that his country expressed its desire to continue building strong economic relations with China, hence “Chinese investments are welcome in France.” However, he also immediately explained that “our companies must benefit from fair conditions of competition in both of our countries. This is the fundamental issue.” And something that the Chinese side did not publish in its communiqué was that, in accordance with Macron’s message, the leaders agreed to deal “as soon as possible” with the issue of cognac from France, which is subject to Chinese tariffs. The French president’s post touched on the issue of wars in Ukraine and Palestine to a broader extent. First, he stated that the common point connecting France (and all of Europe) with China is the establishment of a lasting and strong peace in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war. He added at this point firmly that such peace must begin “with an immediate and unconditional ceasefire.” He went on to note that “we must also work towards a political solution that ensures peace and security for all the people of the Middle East.” Macron announced that France would work with China in preparation for the conference on the two-state solution, scheduled for June in New York. Finally, he announced that he was pleased that Beijing had confirmed its attendance at the next United Nations Ocean Conference.

22.05. Veldkamp in China

Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp met with high-ranking Chinese officials during his visit to China on May 22. The first of them was his Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi. According to the Chinese Foreign Ministry, after previously characterizing the current and uncertain international situation, Wang expressed hope that “the Dutch side will abide by the one-China principle with concrete actions and safeguard the political foundation of China-Netherlands relations.” Similarly, he further emphasized that despite growing global tensions, China remains “committed to high-standard opening up.” He spoke positively about the state of trade relations between China and the Netherlands in many economic sectors. Moreover, he said that China invites the Netherlands “to actively explore the cooperation potential in clean energy, green development, artificial intelligence, and the silver economy.” At the same time, he expects the Netherlands to maintain “a just, fair, and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese enterprises to invest and do business in the country.” The Chinese foreign minister called the Netherlands “the gateway for China-EU cooperation” because, in his opinion, it is a symbol of “open Europe.” He thus expressed his hope that the Netherlands will play a constructive and even more active role in building positive relations with China in the coming years.

Veldkamp repaid his interlocutor by saying that his country “respects China, the Chinese people, and Chinese culture, and admires the tremendous achievements China has made in its development.” He stressed that for the Netherlands, the People’s Republic of China has always been one of the most important partners in the world. He also confirmed that the Netherlands remains committed to the “one China” principle and does not intend to engage in official relations with Taiwan. On his X platform profile, the Dutch Foreign Minister described the meeting as an “important meeting with my colleague Wang Yi in Beijing, at a time when dialogue and global cooperation are more urgent than ever.” He further emphasised the commitment of both countries to supporting climate action, multilateralism and women’s rights. Moving on to business issues, he noted that “the Netherlands and China have much to offer each other business-wise”, but taking into account that there are differences and disputes in these relations. Finally, he added that international security issues were raised, including the risk of a conflict in Taiwan and Chinese support for Russian aggression in Ukraine: “In order to boost EU-China ties, more must be done to address these issues”, Veldkamp said. The Chinese statement also reported in one sentence that such topics were discussed during the conversation.

As for the second meeting, the Dutch minister had the opportunity to exchange views with Chinese Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang. The conversation was not much different from the one with Wang. Ding stated that “is willing to continue the momentum of friendly exchanges with the Netherlands”, taking into account the concerns of both the Dutch and Chinese sides. He emphasized that in building relations with the Netherlands, it is important to strengthen relations and cooperation and jointly protect the prevailing international economic and trade order. He added that the Netherlands will play an increasingly important role in contributing to the “healthy and stable development of China-EU relations”.

Veldkamp, ​​on the other hand, reiterated that the Netherlands and China are important partners for each other, and that his country is ready to increase exchange and cooperation, including in the area of ​​solving global challenges of both an economic and security nature. Confirmation of the above information can be found again on the X platform, where Veldkamp wrote: “We have clear shared interests: trade, addressing global challenges.” He also reported that together with the Chinese Deputy Prime Minister they discussed climate, multilateralism and women’s rights. He did not fail to raise the issue of Chinese involvement in the war in Ukraine: “I also pointed out our concerns. For example, China’s enabling of Russia’s war in Ukraine and human rights issues.”

23.05. Merz-Xi telephone conversation

A few days after the meeting between the German and Chinese foreign ministers, a telephone conversation took place between the leaders of both sides. Xi Jinping congratulated the new chancellor on taking office. In his opening remarks, the Chinese president noted that the world is facing rapid changes that have not been seen for centuries, and that the international landscape itself is revealing itself as “more complex and turbulent”, which at the same time emphasizes the increasingly visible “strategic and overarching significance of China-Germany and China-EU relations.” Therefore, as Xi noted, China is ready for the possibility of cooperation with Germany to “open a new chapter” in bilateral relations. According to the Chinese leader, mutual respect, seeking common ground and putting aside differences are the foundations of Sino-German relations. So, in this spirit, Beijing and Berlin should consolidate political mutual trust, increase the resilience of bilateral relations and inject momentum into their cooperation. Xi further stressed that this “partnership is the proper positioning of China-Germany and China-EU relations”, especially from the perspective of the anniversary of EU-China relations, in which both sides should “review the successful experience” which would send a positive signal to the emerging but threatened multilateralism in the modern world.

Referring to the German spokesman’s report, Merz also expressed his willingness to engage in partnership-based cooperation that would help counteract global challenges. Like Xi, he also emphasized the importance of economic relations between Germany and China, while noting the importance of fair competition and reciprocity. According to the Chinese statement, Merz reaffirmed adherence to the “one China” principle. Similarly, it can be read that “Germany expects to enhance exchanges and cooperation with China in various areas, uphold openness and mutual benefit, boost fair trade, safeguard world peace and jointly tackle climate change and other global challenges.” In addition, Germany is ready to play “a proactive role” in the cooperation of a unified Europe with the People’s Republic of China. The spokesman for the German Chancellor also reported that the leaders raised the issue of the war in Ukraine. Merz appealed to his interlocutor to join the efforts of Europe and the United States to reach a peace agreement as soon as possible. Moreover, Merz and Xi agreed to “soon resume direct exchanges to further develop China-Germany cooperation.”

28.05. Czechs accuse Beijing of cyberattack

On May 28, the Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued an official statement, which stated that “following the national attribution process, the Government of the Czech Republic has identified the People´s Republic of China as being responsible for malicious cyber campaign targeting one of the unclassified networks of the Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” As a result of the attack, thousands of classified emails were exposed. According to the Czech report, the cyber activity was supposed to have lasted from 2022, and the operation itself was carried out by the Chinese state-sponsored group Advanced Persistent Threat 31 (APT31). This group is closely linked to the Ministry of State Security of the People’s Republic of China. The investigation into this matter was conducted by all Czech security services, which are to confirm the certainty of the origin of the cyberattack. In this regard, “the Government of the Czech Republic strongly condemns this malicious cyber campaign against its critical infrastructure.” As noted in the press release of the Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs, such behavior undermines the credibility of the People’s Republic of China in the international arena and contradicts its public declarations, and even more so the common standards and norms of the international community of states. Thus, Prague called on Beijing to start respecting the above norms and principles and refrain from committing similar actions in the future.

Czech Foreign Minister Jan Lipavský accused the Chinese of testing the Czech Republic’s resilience and democracy: “With today’s move, we have exposed China, which has long been working to undermine our resilience and democracy.” He also stated that this is blatant interference in the life of Czech society: “Through cyberattacks, information manipulation, and propaganda, it interferes in our society — and we must defend ourselves against that.

The European Union and the North Atlantic Alliance stood together in solidarity, condemning the entire situation. EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas announced that the Union was ready to take appropriate action to counter China’s malicious actions. “This attack is an unacceptable breach of international norms. The EU will not tolerate hostile cyber actions, and we stand in solidarity with the Czech Republic,” she said during her conference. On the same day, an official statement condemning China’s actions and calling on all countries, “including China,” not to use such solutions, but to respect international law and the norms and principles developed at the UN forum, could also be found on the European Commission’s website. NATO also issued a condemning statement, writing: “We strongly condemn malicious cyber activities intended to undermine our national security, democratic institutions and critical infrastructure.” It went on to emphasize that this behavior is indicative of broader cyber activity, rather than an isolated incident: “We observe with increasing concern the growing pattern of malicious cyber activities stemming from the People’s Republic of China.”

China also addressed the situation through its embassy in Prague. When asked about the APT31 cyberattack, the spokesman for the Chinese diplomatic mission replied: “We express deep concern and strong opposition to the groundless accusations against the Chinese side.” In his opinion, any investigation into the origin of malicious cyber activities must be “based on clear and credible evidence.” He thus questioned the professionalism of the Czech services, stating that “in relation to the so-called APT31, the Chinese side has repeatedly conducted technical analyses and explanations that clearly show that the relevant evidence is insufficient, and the conclusions are unprofessional.” Therefore, the Czech Republic’s “slandering and defaming of China” is absolutely unacceptable to Beijing. He further emphasized that China has always opposed such activities and does not accept, promote or tolerate hacking. Finally, the spokesman for the Chinese embassy in the Czech Republic called on the government in Prague “to immediately correct its mistakes, end microphone diplomacy, and genuinely adhere to and implement the UN Framework for Responsible State Behavior, and to approach cybersecurity issues objectively and honestly.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-Mail
Konrad Falkowski

Related Posts

See All Publications
  • China, European Union, Indo-Pacific, Publications

EU-China Affairs Review January 2026

Mikołaj Woźniak, Karolina Czarnowska 1.01. China warns EU against restrictions on carbon emissions trading The Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM)…
  • Mikołaj Woźniak
  • February 16, 2026
  • Europe, Publications, Russia

Russia Affairs Review January 2026

Ksawery Stawiński, Kateryna Vasylyk 6.01 – Major Demographic Crisis in RussiaDuring the annual international conference “Foundry Council” in Chelyabinsk, renowned…
  • Ksawery Stawiński
  • February 16, 2026
  • Africa and Middle East, Analysis, Publications

Overview of Events in the Middle East – December 2025

Israel–Lebanon Relations: Status as of December 2025 Beirut, December 1–31 Since October 2024, a ceasefire has been in effect between…
  • Kasjusz Matyjasek
  • January 31, 2026
See All Publications

Comments are closed.

Konrad Falkowski
Program Europa tworzą:

Marcin Chruściel

Dyrektor programu. Absolwent studiów doktoranckich z zakresu nauk o polityce na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim, magister stosunków międzynarodowych i europeistyki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prezes Zarządu Instytutu Nowej Europy.

dr Artur Bartoszewicz

Przewodniczący Rady Programowej Instytutu Nowej Europy. Doktor nauk ekonomicznych Szkoły Głównej Handlowej. Ekspert w dziedzinie polityki publicznej, w tym m. in. strategii państwa i gospodarki.

Michał Banasiak

Specjalizuje się w relacjach sportu i polityki. Autor analiz, komentarzy i wywiadów z zakresu dyplomacji sportowej i polityki międzynarodowej. Były dziennikarz Polsat News i wysłannik redakcji zagranicznej Telewizji Polskiej.

Maciej Pawłowski

Ekspert ds. migracji, gospodarki i polityki państw basenu Morza Śródziemnego. W latach 2018-2020 Analityk PISM ds. Południowej Europy. Autor publikacji w polskiej i zagranicznej prasie na temat Hiszpanii, Włoch, Grecji, Egiptu i państw Magrebu. Od września 2020 r. mieszka w północnej Afryce (Egipt, Algieria).

Jędrzej Błaszczak

Absolwent studiów prawniczych Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Katowicach. Jego zainteresowania badawcze koncentrują się na Inicjatywie Trójmorza i polityce w Bułgarii. Doświadczenie zdobywał w European Foundation of Human Rights w Wilnie, Center for the Study of Democracy w Sofii i polskich placówkach dyplomatycznych w Teheranie i Tbilisi.

Program Bezpieczeństwo tworzą:

dr Aleksander Olech

Dyrektor programu. Wykładowca na Baltic Defence College, absolwent Europejskiej Akademii Dyplomacji oraz Akademii Sztuki Wojennej. Jego główne zainteresowania badawcze to terroryzm, bezpieczeństwo w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej oraz rola NATO i UE w środowisku zagrożeń hybrydowych.

dr Agnieszka Rogozińska

Członek Rady Programowej Instytutu Nowej Europy. Doktor nauk społecznych w dyscyplinie nauki o polityce. Zainteresowania badawcze koncentruje na problematyce bezpieczeństwa euroatlantyckiego, instytucjonalnym wymiarze bezpieczeństwa i współczesnych zagrożeniach.

Aleksy Borówka

Doktorant na Wydziale Nauk Społecznych Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Przewodniczący Krajowej Reprezentacji Doktorantów w kadencji 2020. Autor kilkunastu prac naukowych, poświęconych naukom o bezpieczeństwie, naukom o polityce i administracji oraz stosunkom międzynarodowym. Laureat I, II oraz III Międzynarodowej Olimpiady Geopolitycznej.

Karolina Siekierka

Absolwentka Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego na kierunku stosunki międzynarodowe, specjalizacji Bezpieczeństwo i Studia Strategiczne. Jej zainteresowania badawcze obejmują politykę zagraniczną i wewnętrzną Francji, prawa człowieka oraz konflikty zbrojne.

Stanisław Waszczykowski

Podoficer rezerwy, student studiów magisterskich na kierunku Bezpieczeństwo Międzynarodowe i Dyplomacja na Akademii Sztuki Wojennej, były praktykant w BBN. Jego zainteresowania badawcze obejmują m.in. operacje pokojowe ONZ oraz bezpieczeństwo Ukrainy.

Leon Pińczak

Student studiów drugiego stopnia na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim na kierunku stosunki międzynarodowe. Dziennikarz polskojęzycznej redakcji Biełsatu. Zawodowo zajmuje się obszarem postsowieckim, rosyjską polityką wewnętrzną i doktrynami FR. Biegle włada językiem rosyjskim.

Program Indo-Pacyfik tworzą:

Łukasz Kobierski

Dyrektor programu. Współzałożyciel INE oraz prezes zarządu w latach 2019-2021. Stypendysta szkoleń z zakresu bezpieczeństwa na Daniel Morgan Graduate School of National Security w Waszyngtonie, ekspert od stosunków międzynarodowych. Absolwent Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego oraz Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. Wiceprezes Zarządu INE.

dr Joanna Siekiera

Prawnik międzynarodowy, doktor nauk społecznych, adiunkt na Wydziale Prawa Uniwersytetu w Bergen w Norwegii. Była stypendystką rządu Nowej Zelandii na Uniwersytecie Victorii w Wellington, niemieckiego Institute of Cultural Diplomacy, a także francuskiego Institut de relations internationales et stratégiques.

Paweł Paszak

Absolwent stosunków międzynarodowych (spec. Wschodnioazjatycka) na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim oraz stypendysta University of Kent (W. Brytania) i Hainan University (ChRL). Doktorant UW i Akademii Sztuki Wojennej. Jego zainteresowania badawcze obejmują politykę zagraniczną ChRL oraz strategiczną rywalizację Chiny-USA.

Jakub Graca

Magister stosunków międzynarodowych na Uniwersytecie Jagiellońskim; studiował także filologię orientalną (specjalność: arabistyka). Analityk Centrum Inicjatyw Międzynarodowych (Warszawa) oraz Instytutu Nowej Europy. Zainteresowania badawcze: Stany Zjednoczone (z naciskiem na politykę zagraniczną), relacje transatlantyckie.

Patryk Szczotka

Absolwent filologii dalekowschodniej ze specjalnością chińską na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim oraz student kierunku double degree China and International Relations na Aalborg University oraz University of International Relations (国际关系学院) w Pekinie. Jego zainteresowania naukowe to relacje polityczne i gospodarcze UE-ChRL oraz dyplomacja.

The programme's team:

Marcin Chruściel

Programme director. Graduate of PhD studies in Political Science at the University of Wroclaw and Master studies in International Relations at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. President of the Management Board at the Institute of New Europe.

PhD Artur Bartoszewicz

Chairman of the Institute's Programme Board. Doctor of Economic Sciences at the SGH Warsaw School of Economics. Expert in the field of public policy, including state and economic strategies. Expert at the National Centre for Research and Development and the Digital Poland Projects Centre.

Michał Banasiak

He specializes in relationship of sports and politics. Author of analysis, comments and interviews in the field of sports diplomacy and international politics. Former Polsat News and Polish Television’s foreign desk journalist.

Maciej Pawłowski

Expert on migration, economics and politics of Mediterranean countries. In the period of 2018-2020 PISM Analyst on Southern Europe. Author of various articles in Polish and foreign press about Spain, Italy, Greece, Egypt and Maghreb countries. Since September 2020 lives in North Africa (Egypt, Algeria).

Jędrzej Błaszczak

Graduate of Law at the University of Silesia. His research interests focus on the Three Seas Initiative and politics in Bulgaria. He acquired experience at the European Foundation of Human Rights in Vilnius, the Center for the Study of Democracy in Sofia, and in Polish embassies in Tehran and Tbilisi.

PhD Aleksander Olech

Programme director. Visiting lecturer at the Baltic Defence College, graduate of the European Academy of Diplomacy and War Studies University. His main research interests include terrorism, international cooperation for security in Eastern Europe and the role of NATO and the EU with regard to hybrid threats.

PhD Agnieszka Rogozińska

Member of the Institute's Programme Board. Doctor of Social Sciences in the discipline of Political Science. Editorial secretary of the academic journals "Politics & Security" and "Independence: journal devoted to Poland's recent history". Her research interests focus on security issues.

Aleksy Borówka

PhD candidate at the Faculty of Social Sciences in the University of Wroclaw, the President of the Polish National Associations of PhD Candidates in 2020. The author of dozen of scientific papers, concerning security studies, political science, administration, international relations. Laureate of the I, II and III International Geopolitical Olympiad.

Karolina Siekierka

Graduate of International Relations specializing in Security and Strategic Studies at University of Warsaw. Erasmus student at the Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1) and the Institut d’Etudes Politique de Paris (Sciences Po Paris). Her research areas include human rights, climate change and armed conflicts.

Stanisław Waszczykowski

Reserve non-commissioned officer. Master's degree student in International Security and Diplomacy at the War Studies University in Warsaw, former trainee at the National Security Bureau. His research interests include issues related to UN peacekeeping operations and the security of Ukraine.

Leon Pińczak

A second-degree student at the University of Warsaw, majoring in international relations. A journalist of the Polish language edition of Belsat. Interested in the post-Soviet area, with a particular focus on Russian internal politics and Russian doctrines - foreign, defense and information-cybernetic.

Łukasz Kobierski

Programme director. Deputy President of the Management Board. Scholarship holder at the Daniel Morgan Graduate School of National Security in Washington and an expert in the field of international relations. Graduate of the University of Warsaw and the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

PhD Joanna Siekiera

International lawyer, Doctor of social sciences, postdoctor at the Faculty of Law, University of Bergen, Norway. She was a scholarship holder of the New Zealand government at the Victoria University of Wellington, Institute of Cultural Diplomacy in Germany, Institut de relations internationales et stratégiques in France.

Paweł Paszak

Graduate of International Relations (specialisation in East Asian Studies) from the University of Warsaw and scholarship holder at the University of Kent (UK) and Hainan University (China). PhD candidate at the University of Warsaw and the War Studies University. His research areas include the foreign policy of China and the strategic rivalry between China and the US in the Indo-Pacific.

Jakub Graca

Master of International Relations at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. He also studied Arabic therein. An analyst at the Center for International Initiatives (Warsaw) and the Institute of New Europe. Research interests: United States (mainly foreign policy), transatlantic relations.

Patryk Szczotka

A graduate of Far Eastern Philology with a specialization in China Studies at the University of Wroclaw and a student of a double degree “China and International Relations” at Aalborg University and University of International Relations (国际关系学院) in Beijing. His research interests include EU-China political and economic relations, as well as diplomacy.

Three Seas Think Tanks Hub is a platform of cooperation among different think tanks based in 3SI member countries. Their common goal is to strengthen public debate and understanding of the Three Seas region seen from the political, economic and security perspective. The project aims at exchanging ideas, research and publications on the region’s potential and challenges.

Members

The Baltic Security Foundation (Latvia)

The BSF promotes the security and defense of the Baltic Sea region. It gathers security experts from the region and beyond, provides a platform for discussion and research, promotes solutions that lead to stronger regional security in the military and other areas.

The Institute for Politics and Society (Czech Republic)

The Institute analyses important economic, political, and social areas that affect today’s society. The mission of the Institute is to cultivate the Czech political and public sphere through professional and open discussion.

Nézöpont Institute (Hungary)

The Institute aims at improving Hungarian public life and public discourse by providing real data, facts and opinions based on those. Its primary focus points are Hungarian youth, media policy and Central European cooperation.

The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (Austria)

The wiiw is one of the principal centres for research on Central, East and Southeast Europe with 50 years of experience. Over the years, the Institute has broadened its expertise, increasing its regional coverage – to European integration, the countries of Wider Europe and selected issues of the global economy.

The International Institute for Peace (Austria)

The Institute strives to address the most topical issues of the day and promote dialogue, public engagement, and a common understanding to ensure a holistic approach to conflict resolution and a durable peace. The IIP functions as a platform to promote peace and non-violent conflict resolution across the world.

The Institute for Regional and International Studies (Bulgaria)

The IRIS initiates, develops and implements civic strategies for democratic politics at the national, regional and international level. The Institute promotes the values of democracy, civil society, freedom and respect for law and assists the process of deepening Bulgarian integration in NATO and the EU.

The European Institute of Romania

EIR is a public institution whose mission is to provide expertise in the field of European Affairs to the public administration, the business community, the social partners and the civil society. EIR’s activity is focused on four key domains: research, training, communication, translation of the EHRC case-law.

The Institute of New Europe (Poland)

The Institute is an advisory and analytical non-governmental organisation active in the fields of international politics, international security and economics. The Institute supports policy-makers by providing them with expert opinions, as well as creating a platform for academics, publicists, and commentators to exchange ideas.

YouTube

Latest publications

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • EU-China Affairs Review January 2026
    by Mikołaj Woźniak
    February 16, 2026
  • Russia Affairs Review January 2026
    by Ksawery Stawiński
    February 16, 2026
  • Overview of Events in the Middle East – December 2025
    by Kasjusz Matyjasek
    January 31, 2026

Categories

THE MOST POPULAR TAGS:

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

China European Union International politics International security Map Middle East Poland Russia Security Ukraine USA

  • About
  • Publications
  • Europe
  • Security
  • O nas
  • Publikacje
  • Europa
  • Bezpieczeństwo
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
  • People
  • Contact – Careers
  • Indo-Pacyfik
  • Trójmorze
  • Ludzie
  • Kontakt – Kariera

Financed with funds from the National Freedom Institute - Center for Civil Society Development under the Governmental Civil Society Organisations Development Programme for 2018-2030.

Sfinansowano ze środków Narodowego Instytutu Wolności – Centrum Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Obywatelskiego w ramach Rządowego Programu Rozwoju Organizacji Obywatelskich na lata 2018-2030.



© 2019-2024 The Institute of New Europe Foundation · All rights reserved · Support us