Email · kontakt@ine.org.pl
Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe
  • About
  • Publications
      • Publications

        The primary categories of materials published by the Institute as part of its research and analytical activities.

      • SEE ALL PUBLICATIONS

      • Analyses
        Daily commentary and analysis on international issues provided by our experts and analysts
      • Reports
        Comprehensive thematic studies on international relations and socio-political issues
      • Video
        Recordings of expert debates and series of video podcasts created by our team and experts
      • Maps
        Selection of maps depicting international alliances and foreign visits of key politicians
  • Programmes
      • Programmes

        The main areas of research and publication activities at the Institute with separate teams of experts, functioning under the supervision of the head of a particular programme.

      • WEBSITE OF THE THREE SEAS PROJECT

      • Europe
        Analyses and commentaries on European integration and the place of Europe on the political and economic map of the world
      • Security
        Studies in the field of international and internal security of individual states, with particular emphasis on the role of NATO
      • Indo-Pacific
        An overview of the political and economic situation in the region, the status of the U.S.-China rivalry, and the EU’s policy towards China
      • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
        Analyses and studies of the Three Seas Initiative, taking into account the perspectives of the participating states
  • People
  • Contact-Careers
  • Polish-Czech Forum
  • Polski
Institute of New Europe Institute of New Europe
  • About
  • Publications
      • Publications

        The primary categories of materials published by the Institute as part of its research and analytical activities.

      • SEE ALL PUBLICATIONS

      • Analyses
        Daily commentary and analysis on international issues provided by our experts and analysts
      • Reports
        Comprehensive thematic studies on international relations and socio-political issues
      • Video
        Recordings of expert debates and series of video podcasts created by our team and experts
      • Maps
        Selection of maps depicting international alliances and foreign visits of key politicians
  • Programmes
      • Programmes

        The main areas of research and publication activities at the Institute with separate teams of experts, functioning under the supervision of the head of a particular programme.

      • WEBSITE OF THE THREE SEAS PROJECT

      • Europe
        Analyses and commentaries on European integration and the place of Europe on the political and economic map of the world
      • Security
        Studies in the field of international and internal security of individual states, with particular emphasis on the role of NATO
      • Indo-Pacific
        An overview of the political and economic situation in the region, the status of the U.S.-China rivalry, and the EU’s policy towards China
      • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
        Analyses and studies of the Three Seas Initiative, taking into account the perspectives of the participating states
  • People
  • Contact-Careers
  • Polish-Czech Forum
  • Polski
Jul 27
Analysis, Poland, Publications, Turkey

The Türkiye-Poland Strategic Partnership in the Context of the New Security Architecture

July 27, 2025
  • Deep Historical Ties Support Modern Cooperation – Centuries-old relations, dating back to 1414, and symbolic solidarity (e.g., Ottoman refusal to recognize Poland’s partitions) provide a cultural and diplomatic foundation for today’s strategic alignment.
  • Post-Cold War Revival Anchored in NATO and EU Frameworks – Since the 1990s, Türkiye and Poland have institutionalized ties through agreements and intensified collaboration within NATO and, to a lesser extent, via EU-related channels.
  • Shared Security Concerns Drive Defense Cooperation – Russian aggression has led both countries to prioritize defense—evidenced by NATO exercises, Poland’s purchase of Turkish Bayraktar drones, and trilateral coordination with Romania.
  • Energy and Infrastructure Alignments Create Strategic Synergy – Türkiye’s energy transit role (e.g., TANAP) complements Poland’s LNG diversification. Both aim to become Eurasian logistics hubs within the Belt and Road and EU networks.
  • Ideological and Cultural Diplomacy Reinforce the Partnershi- Similar sovereignty-focused politics (AKP–PiS), shared skepticism toward EU oversight, and growing educational/cultural exchanges (e.g., Erasmus, diaspora ties) deepen mutual understanding and public diplomacy.

Introduction

The relations between Türkiye and Poland have a multi-layered structure shaped not only by current strategic interests but also by deep historical roots and cultural interactions. This network of relations, established with the beginning of diplomatic contacts in 1414, deepened over time with the Ottoman Empire accepting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth as one of its traditional partners in Europe, and transformed into a symbolic solidarity with the support provided by the Ottomans during Poland’s historical traumas. The relations, which were interrupted during the Cold War, were revived with democratic transformations and a shift towards Western alliances in the post-1990 period, and settled on a more structural basis, especially within the framework of NATO and the EU.

1. A Brief Look at Turkish-Polish Relations

Historical Ties (Ottoman period – Polish Kingdom relations)

Diplomatic relations between Türkiye and Poland date back to 1414, when Polish King Władysław Jagiełło sent ambassadors to Ottoman Sultan Çelebi Mehmed (İlhan, 2019, p. 3-4). While these relations are often framed as one of the Ottoman Empire’s deepest diplomatic contacts in the West, their significance lies not merely in symbolic history, but in providing a foundation for today’s pragmatic partnership in security and energy. The historical legacy, once largely ceremonial, now facilitates strategic cooperation as both countries seek partners in an increasingly polarized European security environment. .

Although Poland was shared by three great Powers at the end of the 18th century, the Ottoman Empire did not recognize the partition of Poland and protested this situation symbolically. For example, in diplomatic receptions held in the Ottoman palace, the presence of Poland was emphasized by saying ” The Polish envoy has not arrived” (Mierzwa, 2015, p. 6-8).

In the 19th century, Polish refugees played important roles in Ottoman lands. Among the Poles who took refuge in the Ottoman Empire, especially after the November 1830 Uprising and the January 1863 Uprising, there were those who joined the army (e.g. Józef Bem – Murad Pasha), translators and scientists (İlhan, 2019, p. 9; Mierzwa, 2015, p. 7). During this period, Polonezköy (Adampol), established on the Anatolian side of Istanbul, became an important political and cultural shelter supported by Prince Adam Czartoryski (Mierzwa, 2015, p. 6-7). In the 20th century, Poland was seen as an important partner in the Ottoman policy against Russia, and the Poles participated in wars on the Ottoman side in this direction. The warm relations that began during the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent were further strengthened with the Ottoman-Polish agreement signed in 1533 (İlhan, 2019, p. 4).

1.1 Revival of Post-Cold War Relations

After World War II, diplomatic relations between Türkiye and Poland were interrupted. Poland’s position in the socialist bloc and Türkiye’s position in the Western camp, which is a member of NATO, caused relations to continue on a cold line (Mierzwa, 2015, p. 11-12; İlhan, 2019, p. 35).

However, after 1990, with Poland abandoning the socialist regime and embracing liberal democracy, relations between the two countries were revived. The “Friendship and Cooperation Agreement” signed on November 3, 1993, institutionalized Türkiye-Poland relations after the Cold War, establishing a formal framework for political and economic collaboration. This agreement was a continuation of the first friendship agreement signed in Lausanne in 1923 (Mierzwa, 2015, pp. 7-12). Similar milestones followed, such as the establishment of the “High-Level Consultative Committee” in the same decade, and Poland’s support for Türkiye’s EU candidacy during the early 2000s. These institutional steps marked a transition from historical goodwill to structured strategic cooperation

The “High-Level Consultative Committee” established in the post-1993 period pioneered the establishment of direct connections between mutual governments, universities, cultural institutions and local governments. Within the scope of the Science, Culture and Education Program, which came into force between 2003 and 2006, concrete projects such as student exchange programs, academic collaborations and the digitalization of historical sites such as Adampol village were implemented (Mierzwa, 2015, pp. 7-13).

1.2 Institutionalization of Relations through the EU and NATO

Poland’s full membership status in NATO in 1999 and in the European Union in 2004 allowed relations between Türkiye and Poland to be established on a more structural basis. In particular, within NATO, the two countries carry out joint activities, primarily in the fight against terrorism, border security and regional stability (İlhan, 2019, p. 35-36; Mierzwa, 2015, pp. 11-12).

Türkiye has occasionally received indirect support from Poland in its relations with the EU. It has been stated that Türkiye could be a bridge to Türkiye within the scope of Poland’s “eastern opening”, especially during Türkiye’s EU membership process. Poland has the potential to be an intermediary actor between the EU and Türkiye, and this creates a strategic advantage for bilateral relations. Relations, which have been institutionalized with various agreements since the 1990s, have been enriched with mutual arrangements in the fields of trade, investment, customs cooperation, combating tax evasion, tourism, education and culture (Mierzwa, 2015, p. 12).

1.3 Cooperation Developing on Issues Such as the Ukrainian War, Migration, and Energy in Recent Years

The developments in Ukraine in 2014 and Russia’s annexation of Crimea have made regional security a priority for both Poland and Türkiye. Since then, both countries have participated in NATO joint military exercises focused on Eastern European security and Black Sea stability. Poland’s hosting of over 1.5 million Ukrainian refugees and Türkiye’s status as the country hosting over 4 million refugees highlight the shared challenges of managing large-scale migrant flows.

Within NATO, Türkiye and Poland have strengthened defense industry cooperation: the sale of 24 Bayraktar TB2 drones to Poland in 2021 marked Poland as the first NATO country to purchase Turkish UAV systems (The Economic Times, 2021). In the energy sector, Türkiye’s role as a gas transit hub, with the TANAP pipeline transferring over 16 bcm (billion cubic meters) of gas annually to Europe, complements Poland’s LNG diversification strategy, including its terminal in Świnoujście with a regasification capacity of 8.3 bcm/year (Enerdata, 2025; Anadolu Agency, 2023).

These concrete initiatives demonstrate that cooperation between Türkiye and Poland has shifted from general diplomatic alignment to practical, infrastructure-focused, and defense-oriented collaboration in response to Russia’s threat.

In addition, the events organized on the occasion of the 600th anniversary of Türkiye-Poland diplomatic relations celebrated in 2014 have accelerated cultural diplomacy. In this context, concerts, exhibitions and academic symposiums held in Istanbul and Warsaw brought the public opinion of the two countries closer together (İlhan, 2019, p. 38-42; Mierzwa, 2015, p. 6-10)..

2. Pillars of the Emerging Türkiye-Poland Strategic Partnership

2.1. NATO and Military Cooperation

Poland and Türkiye stand out as two critical actors on the eastern flank of NATO. Poland became a member of NATO in 1999; with this development, its relations with Türkiye in the field of defense gained a strategic dimension (Financial Times, 2023). Both countries cooperate, especially in the context of strengthening deterrence against Russia in Eastern Europe.

Poland’s position in the Baltics and Black Sea security overlaps with Türkiye’s regional defense vision. While Türkiye limits the entry of non-NATO actors by protecting the Montreux Convention in the Black Sea, Poland is increasing its defense investments against Russia’s aggressive policies in the Baltic Sea (CATS, 2024).

In addition, the sale of Bayraktar TB2 SİHA between the two countries was also an important turning point. Poland became the first NATO country to receive this system from Türkiye, and this was considered not only a technical purchase but also an indicator of strategic harmony in the security axis (Financial Times, 2023). The trilateral Türkiye-Romania-Poland dialogue organized within the framework of NATO is also an important platform for regional military coordination.

This security-first approach is broadly supported across Türkiye’s political spectrum. The ruling AKP and its nationalist MHP allies view NATO-based military cooperation with Poland as central to their foreign policy priorities. Even the opposition CHP and İYİ Party, despite their differing ideological stances, consider NATO cooperation with Poland as a fundamental security guarantee. While the AKP emphasizes pragmatic and flexible diplomacy, often focusing on bilateral defense agreements and energy partnerships, the MHP frames this cooperation as essential for national security and Eastern European military strategy. The CHP and İYİ Party, although more aligned with EU norms, also support NATO collaboration, viewing it as Türkiye’s essential security anchor.

2.2. Strategic Partnership in the Context of the Ukraine War

The Ukraine war that began in 2022 led Türkiye and Poland to a closer strategic cooperation. While Poland gave open support to Kiev, Türkiye adopted a “balance policy”, on the one hand providing Ukraine with UAVs and naval platforms, on the other hand maintaining economic and diplomatic relations with Russia (CATS, 2024).

In this context, Türkiye played a key role in the implementation of the Black Sea Grain Corridor agreement and demonstrated its diplomatic influence. Poland, on the other hand, supported Türkiye as an important mediator in such initiatives. Türkiye’s proposal for a trilateral summit in Istanbul (USA, Ukraine, Russia) has also demonstrated Ankara’s diplomatic influence capacity at the global level.

It is observed that both countries have taken a position against Russia’s expansionist policies, but they do so with different methods. The search for a balance between Türkiye’s multipolar diplomacy approach and Poland’s Atlanticist approach continues.

2.3. Energy Security and Logistics Lines

Energy security is another area of ​​strategic importance in Turkish-Polish relations. Both countries are dependent on energy imports, which has led them to cooperate on LNG, pipelines, and alternative energy sources.

While Poland positions itself as a key logistics and energy hub within the European Union, enhancing its infrastructure to diversify supply routes away from Russian sources, Türkiye aims to become a transit center linking Asia to Europe through its Middle Corridor strategy. In the context of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), both countries have the potential to become logistics centers. Poland’s central role in Europe’s railway networks, in particular, coincides with Türkiye’s efforts to connect to these lines via the Caucasus and Central Asia (Financial Times, 2023).

The ruling AKP has emphasized energy cooperation as a key element of foreign policy toward Poland, seeing Poland’s demand for diversified supply routes as an opportunity to strengthen Türkiye’s position as an energy hub. Similarly, İYİ Party and CHP also highlight the importance of energy security cooperation in their respective policy discourses, advocating increased trade and technological partnerships with European states like Poland.

In addition, joint R&D efforts in the field of green energy technologies (solar and wind) are also on the agenda in energy cooperation. It has been stated that both countries aim for technology and infrastructure-based development in order to avoid the middle-income trap.

2.4. EU and Democracy Debates

Poland and Türkiye have experienced various tensions in their relations with the EU in recent years and have frequently been the target of criticism on issues such as the rule of law, media freedom and judicial independence. While the European Parliament has referred to Türkiye as “transitioning to full authoritarianism,” Poland has also frequently clashed with the EU due to its judicial reforms.

An ideological convergence between Türkiye’s ruling AKP and Poland’s Law and Justice Party (PiS) helps explain this parallel trajectory. Both parties emphasize national sovereignty, conservative family values, and skepticism toward EU oversight, which facilitates informal cooperation in prioritizing national autonomy within the EU framework. The AKP, like PiS, portrays EU conditionality as a challenge to national autonomy, even while maintaining official pro-membership rhetoric. These similarities contribute to the formation of a sovereignty-focused partnership that shapes both countries’ relations with the EU (Potera, 2021, s. 207-211).

In contrast, Türkiye’s CHP and İYİ Party emphasize the importance of aligning with European democratic standards and value-sharing, viewing Poland’s experience as both a partner and a point of constructive dialogue within the broader European framework. CHP parliamentarians, in particular, have highlighted the importance of ongoing dialogue on rule of law and human rights within platforms such as PACE, viewing these discussions as opportunities to strengthen mutual understanding and cooperation between Türkiye and Poland. Nevertheless, even these opposition parties acknowledge that Poland’s successful EU accession journey provides valuable experiences and inspiration for Türkiye’s own path towards European integration (Forysiński & Osiewicz, 2007, p. 5).

Poland has been one of the rare countries that openly supports Türkiye’s EU membership. Warsaw argues that Türkiye’s membership has strategic significance for the EU’s eastward expansion, which will pave the way for Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia (Financial Times, 2023). In addition, the Hungary-Poland-Türkiye trio draws attention as a new axis within Europe. Their common points are foreign policy tendencies that prioritize national sovereignty and distance themselves from Western-centered values.

2.5. Education, Culture and Social Relations

Educational and cultural relations between Türkiye and Poland are developing through Erasmus student exchange programs, joint events and public diplomacy. Turkish students, especially in recent years, have seen Poland as an attractive destination for higher education.

At the same time, the Turkish diaspora living in Poland, although limited in number, is important in terms of cultural interaction. In both countries, common historical narratives contribute to the reinterpretation of the diplomatic heritage extending from Ottoman-Polish relations to the present day through public diplomacy. Poland being the first Western country to accept an ambassador during the Ottoman embassy period is one of the cornerstones of this historical bond (Financial Times, 2023).

Political parties in Türkiye generally support deepening educational and cultural ties with Poland. While the AKP emphasizes cultural diplomacy and shared historical narratives as tools of soft power, the CHP and İYİ Party highlight the importance of expanding academic collaborations and technical exchange programs, viewing them as mutually beneficial avenues for institutional development and integration into the broader European educational space. Across the political spectrum, Poland is seen as both a valued partner and an example in advancing people-to-people contacts and fostering long-term cooperation in education and culture.

Cultural collaborations positively affect mutual perception between the two peoples and contribute to the strengthening of broader strategic relations on a social basis.

Conclusion

Relations between Türkiye and Poland have evolved beyond historical heritage into a strategic partnership in today’s multipolar and fragile security environment. Military cooperation under the NATO umbrella, diplomatic rapprochement developing in the context of the Ukraine war, and common interests in areas such as energy security are increasingly bringing the two countries to a more compatible position. When Türkiye’s goal of becoming the Middle Corridor and logistics center is combined with Poland’s transit role within the EU, it is seen that the economic and geostrategic ties between the two countries are strengthening. At the same time, these two countries, which share similar perspectives on issues of national sovereignty and institutional autonomy within the EU, have the potential to develop a complementary partnership within the evolving landscape of European politics. Cultural interactions, diasporic ties, and educational cooperation shaped by programs such as Erasmus constitute the social basis of this strategic rapprochement. Türkiye and Poland are drawing closer not only with the symbolic friendship of the past, but also with the need for partnership forced by current geopolitical realities. In this context, the relations between the two countries are candidates to assume important roles not only at the bilateral level, but also in multilateral platforms such as European security, energy supply, and diplomatic mediation. The mutual strategic dependence of Türkiye and Poland makes them two important stakeholders in the new security order.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

  • Mierzwa, J. (2015). Polish-Turkish relations in the 19th and 20th centuries: The struggle for independence and modernization. Journal of Economics and Management, 20(A), 6–18. University of Economics in Katowice.
  • İlhan, S. (2019). Turkey-Poland relations between 1923 and 2019 (Master’s thesis). Gaziantep University.
  • Potera, N. (2021). Polish-Turkish relations under the rule of Law and Justice Party. Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań.
  • The Economic Times. (2021, May 24). Poland to become first NATO country to buy Turkish drones. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/poland-to-become-first-nato-country-to-buy-turkish-drones/articleshow/82908332.cms?from=mdr
  • Aslan, M. C. (2022). Party-level Foreign Policy and the Mechanics of Party Competition: The PiS’s Euroscepticism and Its Dominance over Right-wing Politics in Poland, 2001-2015. SİYASAL: Journal of Political Sciences, 31(Suppl. 1), S105–S116. http://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.949087
  • Enerdata. (2025, January 27). Gaz-System completes LNG terminal expansion in Poland to 8.3 bcm/year. https://www.enerdata.net/publications/daily-energy-news/gaz-system-completes-lng-terminal-expansion-poland-83-bcmyear.html
  • Anadolu Agency. (2023, January 14). 97.3 bcm of gas delivered to Türkiye, Europe via TurkStream, TANAP pipelines. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/economy/973-bcm-of-gas-delivered-to-turkiye-europe-via-turkstream-tanap-pipelines/2786823
  • Forysinski, Wojciech & Osiewicz, Przemyslaw. (2007). The EU-Turkey Accession Negotiations from the Polish Perspective: Allies or Competitors?.
  • Military briefing: How Turkey became vital to European security. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/1de61da8-2481-4371-a0cd-b24ffba8b210
  • Dalay, G., Adar, S., Côrte-Real, A., Talbot, V., & Reljić, D. (2024, June 13). Turkey’s navigation in a multipolar security landscape. CATS Network Perspectives, Centre for Applied Turkey Studies. https://www.cats-network.eu/publication/turkeys-navigation-in-a-multipolar-security-landscape-1
  • Strategic Culture Foundation. (2015, December 18). Turkey-Poland partnership in the new strategic environment – Analysis. Eurasia Review. https://www.eurasiareview.com/18122015-turkey-poland-partnership-in-the-new-strategic-environment-analysis/

Photo: gov.pl

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-Mail
Uğur Can Özkan is the co-founder, editor, and researcher at Reymonta, an independent platform for critical inquiry into international affairs. His academic interests include International Law, Eastern Europe, and Security Studies. He previously studied at Jagiellonian University in Kraków as part of the Erasmus+ program and is currently a prospective graduate student in International Relations at the University of Warsaw, with a focus on the evolving nexus of law, security, and regional politics.

Related Posts

See All Publications
  • China, European Union, Indo-Pacific, Publications

EU-China Affairs Review January 2026

Mikołaj Woźniak, Karolina Czarnowska 1.01. China warns EU against restrictions on carbon emissions trading The Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM)…
  • Mikołaj Woźniak
  • February 16, 2026
  • Europe, Publications, Russia

Russia Affairs Review January 2026

Ksawery Stawiński, Kateryna Vasylyk 6.01 – Major Demographic Crisis in RussiaDuring the annual international conference “Foundry Council” in Chelyabinsk, renowned…
  • Ksawery Stawiński
  • February 16, 2026
  • Africa and Middle East, Analysis, Publications

Overview of Events in the Middle East – December 2025

Israel–Lebanon Relations: Status as of December 2025 Beirut, December 1–31 Since October 2024, a ceasefire has been in effect between…
  • Kasjusz Matyjasek
  • January 31, 2026
See All Publications

Comments are closed.

Uğur Can Özkan is the co-founder, editor, and researcher at Reymonta, an independent platform for critical inquiry into international affairs. His academic interests include International Law, Eastern Europe, and Security Studies. He previously studied at Jagiellonian University in Kraków as part of the Erasmus+ program and is currently a prospective graduate student in International Relations at the University of Warsaw, with a focus on the evolving nexus of law, security, and regional politics.
Program Europa tworzą:

Marcin Chruściel

Dyrektor programu. Absolwent studiów doktoranckich z zakresu nauk o polityce na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim, magister stosunków międzynarodowych i europeistyki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prezes Zarządu Instytutu Nowej Europy.

dr Artur Bartoszewicz

Przewodniczący Rady Programowej Instytutu Nowej Europy. Doktor nauk ekonomicznych Szkoły Głównej Handlowej. Ekspert w dziedzinie polityki publicznej, w tym m. in. strategii państwa i gospodarki.

Michał Banasiak

Specjalizuje się w relacjach sportu i polityki. Autor analiz, komentarzy i wywiadów z zakresu dyplomacji sportowej i polityki międzynarodowej. Były dziennikarz Polsat News i wysłannik redakcji zagranicznej Telewizji Polskiej.

Maciej Pawłowski

Ekspert ds. migracji, gospodarki i polityki państw basenu Morza Śródziemnego. W latach 2018-2020 Analityk PISM ds. Południowej Europy. Autor publikacji w polskiej i zagranicznej prasie na temat Hiszpanii, Włoch, Grecji, Egiptu i państw Magrebu. Od września 2020 r. mieszka w północnej Afryce (Egipt, Algieria).

Jędrzej Błaszczak

Absolwent studiów prawniczych Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Katowicach. Jego zainteresowania badawcze koncentrują się na Inicjatywie Trójmorza i polityce w Bułgarii. Doświadczenie zdobywał w European Foundation of Human Rights w Wilnie, Center for the Study of Democracy w Sofii i polskich placówkach dyplomatycznych w Teheranie i Tbilisi.

Program Bezpieczeństwo tworzą:

dr Aleksander Olech

Dyrektor programu. Wykładowca na Baltic Defence College, absolwent Europejskiej Akademii Dyplomacji oraz Akademii Sztuki Wojennej. Jego główne zainteresowania badawcze to terroryzm, bezpieczeństwo w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej oraz rola NATO i UE w środowisku zagrożeń hybrydowych.

dr Agnieszka Rogozińska

Członek Rady Programowej Instytutu Nowej Europy. Doktor nauk społecznych w dyscyplinie nauki o polityce. Zainteresowania badawcze koncentruje na problematyce bezpieczeństwa euroatlantyckiego, instytucjonalnym wymiarze bezpieczeństwa i współczesnych zagrożeniach.

Aleksy Borówka

Doktorant na Wydziale Nauk Społecznych Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Przewodniczący Krajowej Reprezentacji Doktorantów w kadencji 2020. Autor kilkunastu prac naukowych, poświęconych naukom o bezpieczeństwie, naukom o polityce i administracji oraz stosunkom międzynarodowym. Laureat I, II oraz III Międzynarodowej Olimpiady Geopolitycznej.

Karolina Siekierka

Absolwentka Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego na kierunku stosunki międzynarodowe, specjalizacji Bezpieczeństwo i Studia Strategiczne. Jej zainteresowania badawcze obejmują politykę zagraniczną i wewnętrzną Francji, prawa człowieka oraz konflikty zbrojne.

Stanisław Waszczykowski

Podoficer rezerwy, student studiów magisterskich na kierunku Bezpieczeństwo Międzynarodowe i Dyplomacja na Akademii Sztuki Wojennej, były praktykant w BBN. Jego zainteresowania badawcze obejmują m.in. operacje pokojowe ONZ oraz bezpieczeństwo Ukrainy.

Leon Pińczak

Student studiów drugiego stopnia na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim na kierunku stosunki międzynarodowe. Dziennikarz polskojęzycznej redakcji Biełsatu. Zawodowo zajmuje się obszarem postsowieckim, rosyjską polityką wewnętrzną i doktrynami FR. Biegle włada językiem rosyjskim.

Program Indo-Pacyfik tworzą:

Łukasz Kobierski

Dyrektor programu. Współzałożyciel INE oraz prezes zarządu w latach 2019-2021. Stypendysta szkoleń z zakresu bezpieczeństwa na Daniel Morgan Graduate School of National Security w Waszyngtonie, ekspert od stosunków międzynarodowych. Absolwent Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego oraz Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. Wiceprezes Zarządu INE.

dr Joanna Siekiera

Prawnik międzynarodowy, doktor nauk społecznych, adiunkt na Wydziale Prawa Uniwersytetu w Bergen w Norwegii. Była stypendystką rządu Nowej Zelandii na Uniwersytecie Victorii w Wellington, niemieckiego Institute of Cultural Diplomacy, a także francuskiego Institut de relations internationales et stratégiques.

Paweł Paszak

Absolwent stosunków międzynarodowych (spec. Wschodnioazjatycka) na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim oraz stypendysta University of Kent (W. Brytania) i Hainan University (ChRL). Doktorant UW i Akademii Sztuki Wojennej. Jego zainteresowania badawcze obejmują politykę zagraniczną ChRL oraz strategiczną rywalizację Chiny-USA.

Jakub Graca

Magister stosunków międzynarodowych na Uniwersytecie Jagiellońskim; studiował także filologię orientalną (specjalność: arabistyka). Analityk Centrum Inicjatyw Międzynarodowych (Warszawa) oraz Instytutu Nowej Europy. Zainteresowania badawcze: Stany Zjednoczone (z naciskiem na politykę zagraniczną), relacje transatlantyckie.

Patryk Szczotka

Absolwent filologii dalekowschodniej ze specjalnością chińską na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim oraz student kierunku double degree China and International Relations na Aalborg University oraz University of International Relations (国际关系学院) w Pekinie. Jego zainteresowania naukowe to relacje polityczne i gospodarcze UE-ChRL oraz dyplomacja.

The programme's team:

Marcin Chruściel

Programme director. Graduate of PhD studies in Political Science at the University of Wroclaw and Master studies in International Relations at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. President of the Management Board at the Institute of New Europe.

PhD Artur Bartoszewicz

Chairman of the Institute's Programme Board. Doctor of Economic Sciences at the SGH Warsaw School of Economics. Expert in the field of public policy, including state and economic strategies. Expert at the National Centre for Research and Development and the Digital Poland Projects Centre.

Michał Banasiak

He specializes in relationship of sports and politics. Author of analysis, comments and interviews in the field of sports diplomacy and international politics. Former Polsat News and Polish Television’s foreign desk journalist.

Maciej Pawłowski

Expert on migration, economics and politics of Mediterranean countries. In the period of 2018-2020 PISM Analyst on Southern Europe. Author of various articles in Polish and foreign press about Spain, Italy, Greece, Egypt and Maghreb countries. Since September 2020 lives in North Africa (Egypt, Algeria).

Jędrzej Błaszczak

Graduate of Law at the University of Silesia. His research interests focus on the Three Seas Initiative and politics in Bulgaria. He acquired experience at the European Foundation of Human Rights in Vilnius, the Center for the Study of Democracy in Sofia, and in Polish embassies in Tehran and Tbilisi.

PhD Aleksander Olech

Programme director. Visiting lecturer at the Baltic Defence College, graduate of the European Academy of Diplomacy and War Studies University. His main research interests include terrorism, international cooperation for security in Eastern Europe and the role of NATO and the EU with regard to hybrid threats.

PhD Agnieszka Rogozińska

Member of the Institute's Programme Board. Doctor of Social Sciences in the discipline of Political Science. Editorial secretary of the academic journals "Politics & Security" and "Independence: journal devoted to Poland's recent history". Her research interests focus on security issues.

Aleksy Borówka

PhD candidate at the Faculty of Social Sciences in the University of Wroclaw, the President of the Polish National Associations of PhD Candidates in 2020. The author of dozen of scientific papers, concerning security studies, political science, administration, international relations. Laureate of the I, II and III International Geopolitical Olympiad.

Karolina Siekierka

Graduate of International Relations specializing in Security and Strategic Studies at University of Warsaw. Erasmus student at the Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1) and the Institut d’Etudes Politique de Paris (Sciences Po Paris). Her research areas include human rights, climate change and armed conflicts.

Stanisław Waszczykowski

Reserve non-commissioned officer. Master's degree student in International Security and Diplomacy at the War Studies University in Warsaw, former trainee at the National Security Bureau. His research interests include issues related to UN peacekeeping operations and the security of Ukraine.

Leon Pińczak

A second-degree student at the University of Warsaw, majoring in international relations. A journalist of the Polish language edition of Belsat. Interested in the post-Soviet area, with a particular focus on Russian internal politics and Russian doctrines - foreign, defense and information-cybernetic.

Łukasz Kobierski

Programme director. Deputy President of the Management Board. Scholarship holder at the Daniel Morgan Graduate School of National Security in Washington and an expert in the field of international relations. Graduate of the University of Warsaw and the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

PhD Joanna Siekiera

International lawyer, Doctor of social sciences, postdoctor at the Faculty of Law, University of Bergen, Norway. She was a scholarship holder of the New Zealand government at the Victoria University of Wellington, Institute of Cultural Diplomacy in Germany, Institut de relations internationales et stratégiques in France.

Paweł Paszak

Graduate of International Relations (specialisation in East Asian Studies) from the University of Warsaw and scholarship holder at the University of Kent (UK) and Hainan University (China). PhD candidate at the University of Warsaw and the War Studies University. His research areas include the foreign policy of China and the strategic rivalry between China and the US in the Indo-Pacific.

Jakub Graca

Master of International Relations at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. He also studied Arabic therein. An analyst at the Center for International Initiatives (Warsaw) and the Institute of New Europe. Research interests: United States (mainly foreign policy), transatlantic relations.

Patryk Szczotka

A graduate of Far Eastern Philology with a specialization in China Studies at the University of Wroclaw and a student of a double degree “China and International Relations” at Aalborg University and University of International Relations (国际关系学院) in Beijing. His research interests include EU-China political and economic relations, as well as diplomacy.

Three Seas Think Tanks Hub is a platform of cooperation among different think tanks based in 3SI member countries. Their common goal is to strengthen public debate and understanding of the Three Seas region seen from the political, economic and security perspective. The project aims at exchanging ideas, research and publications on the region’s potential and challenges.

Members

The Baltic Security Foundation (Latvia)

The BSF promotes the security and defense of the Baltic Sea region. It gathers security experts from the region and beyond, provides a platform for discussion and research, promotes solutions that lead to stronger regional security in the military and other areas.

The Institute for Politics and Society (Czech Republic)

The Institute analyses important economic, political, and social areas that affect today’s society. The mission of the Institute is to cultivate the Czech political and public sphere through professional and open discussion.

Nézöpont Institute (Hungary)

The Institute aims at improving Hungarian public life and public discourse by providing real data, facts and opinions based on those. Its primary focus points are Hungarian youth, media policy and Central European cooperation.

The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (Austria)

The wiiw is one of the principal centres for research on Central, East and Southeast Europe with 50 years of experience. Over the years, the Institute has broadened its expertise, increasing its regional coverage – to European integration, the countries of Wider Europe and selected issues of the global economy.

The International Institute for Peace (Austria)

The Institute strives to address the most topical issues of the day and promote dialogue, public engagement, and a common understanding to ensure a holistic approach to conflict resolution and a durable peace. The IIP functions as a platform to promote peace and non-violent conflict resolution across the world.

The Institute for Regional and International Studies (Bulgaria)

The IRIS initiates, develops and implements civic strategies for democratic politics at the national, regional and international level. The Institute promotes the values of democracy, civil society, freedom and respect for law and assists the process of deepening Bulgarian integration in NATO and the EU.

The European Institute of Romania

EIR is a public institution whose mission is to provide expertise in the field of European Affairs to the public administration, the business community, the social partners and the civil society. EIR’s activity is focused on four key domains: research, training, communication, translation of the EHRC case-law.

The Institute of New Europe (Poland)

The Institute is an advisory and analytical non-governmental organisation active in the fields of international politics, international security and economics. The Institute supports policy-makers by providing them with expert opinions, as well as creating a platform for academics, publicists, and commentators to exchange ideas.

YouTube

Latest publications

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • EU-China Affairs Review January 2026
    by Mikołaj Woźniak
    February 16, 2026
  • Russia Affairs Review January 2026
    by Ksawery Stawiński
    February 16, 2026
  • Overview of Events in the Middle East – December 2025
    by Kasjusz Matyjasek
    January 31, 2026

Categories

THE MOST POPULAR TAGS:

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

China European Union International politics International security Map Middle East Poland Russia Security Ukraine USA

  • About
  • Publications
  • Europe
  • Security
  • O nas
  • Publikacje
  • Europa
  • Bezpieczeństwo
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Three Seas Think Tanks Hub
  • People
  • Contact – Careers
  • Indo-Pacyfik
  • Trójmorze
  • Ludzie
  • Kontakt – Kariera

Financed with funds from the National Freedom Institute - Center for Civil Society Development under the Governmental Civil Society Organisations Development Programme for 2018-2030.

Sfinansowano ze środków Narodowego Instytutu Wolności – Centrum Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Obywatelskiego w ramach Rządowego Programu Rozwoju Organizacji Obywatelskich na lata 2018-2030.



© 2019-2024 The Institute of New Europe Foundation · All rights reserved · Support us